• Teppichbrand@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Innovation is a scam, it breeds endless bullshit we keep buying and talking about like 10 year olds with their latest gimmick.
    Look, they replaced this button with A TOUCHSCREEN!
    Look! This artficial face has PORES NOW!
    LOOK! This coffee machine costs 2000$ now and uses PROPRIATARY SUPEREXPENSIVE CAPSULES!!
    We need progress, which is harder to do because it takes a paradigm shift on an Individual and social level. It’s much less gadgety.

    • Veraxus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      You’re not wrong. We’ve reached a point, technologically, where there is little-to-no true innovation left… and what I mean by that is that everything is now built on incredible amounts of work by others who came before. “Standing on the shoulders of giants”, as it were. And yet we have a corrupt “patent” system that is exclusively used to steal the work of those giants while at the same time depriving all of humanity of true progress. And why? So that a handful of very rich people can get even more rich.

      • Teppichbrand@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        Exactly, innovations no longer help to satisfy real basic needs, they are used to create new, artificial needs. Always new toys that make us feel like we’re making progress.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          That’s not true, but to have planned “innovation” bring profit you need to impede real progress. Cause real progress disrupts such plans.

    • shrugs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 days ago

      Innovatin is good if it results in clean water, meds, housing, safe food and goods and services.

      It’s bad if it means: the most profit for useless shit that people only buy because advertisment made them believe they need it.

      Capitalism is a tool. Please let’s grow a pair and stop letting it decide how it will be used. It’s like pulling the trigger on an ak47 without holding it tight. Do we expect the weapon to know where to shot?

      Capitalism is a tool that wants to maximize its profits. Unfortunately it discovered that changing the politics and laws is an easy way to do that, even if it’s bad for the people.

      Capitalism is per definition not bound to ethics or moral. We need to set rules, even if big corporations made us to believe we shouldn’t.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        We need to set rules, even if big corporations made us to believe we shouldn’t.

        That’s a strawman, possibly aimed at libertarians. Like everyone else, corps want to set rules which benefit them.

    • UnpluggedFridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      I remember hearing this argument before…about the Internet. Glad that fad went away.

      As it has always been, these technologies are being used to push us forward by teams of underpaid unnamed researchers with no interest in profit. Meanwhile you focus on the scammers and capitalists and unload your wallets to them, all while complaining about the lack of progress as measured by the products you see in advertisements.

      Luckily, when you get that cancer diagnosis or your child is born with some rare disease, that progress will attend to your needs despite your ignorance if it.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 days ago

        Exactly. OP is mad at alienation, not at progress. In a different, less stupid world these labor saving devices would actually be great, leading to a better quality of life for everyone, and getting a really awesome coffee maker. But the people making the decisions aren’t the consumers or the researchers.

      • Teppichbrand@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        You misunderstood me. I have nothing against progress. Medical progress is great! But what is often sold to us as innovation is not progress but just more nonsense that only pretends to get us further.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 days ago

      Fun fact the first Mr coffee cost 300 dollars in 1971, which would be more than 2000 dollars today

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      We need progress, which is harder to do because it takes a paradigm shift on an Individual and social level.

      Sometimes it just takes a marginal improvement to the quality of the engineering. But these “what if manual labor but fascade of robots!” gimmicks aren’t improvements in engineering. They’re an effort to cut corners on quality in pursuit of a higher profit margin.

      Even setting aside you believe these aren’t just a line up of mechanical turks controlled from a sweetshop in the Philippines, their work product isn’t anything approaching good. Its just cheap.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Improvement is not a scam.

      Innovation is a scam created by representing change as improvement when it isn’t.

      And every time change gets replaced with innovation, it’s connected to totalitarian\fascist tendencies, because it makes easier to sell societal change which is clearly not improvement.

      A person who seriously affected my life advised “Homo Ludens” by Johan Huizinga, not sure whether because of the part of it about fascism in the 30s.