• henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    So the implication is that keeping the masses in check is the primary goal and protecting the children was the incidental part?

    • fluckx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      We do this to find criminals, drugsdealers, paedophiles and terrorists. MEPS are never part of any of those groups.

      Source: trust me bro >.>

      Rules for thee and not for me.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Just remember “terrorism” is a generic term these days. Russia invaded Ukraine over “terrorism.”

        It wouldn’t shock me if they started carefully monitoring political views to detect anything the state doesn’t like.

    • XTL@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Protecting children has never been an intention or an outcome with these laws.