• Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    That looks like poop in a bag. Should we be lining our walls with poop in a bag? TLDR: it wasn’t poop in a bag.

  • activistPnk@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Enshitification warning: #Arstechnica manages to push bandwidth-wasting autoplay video in a way that bypasses Firefox’s setting to disable autoplay.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Researchers at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) in Australia have developed special “energy-smart bricks” that can be made by mixing clay with glass waste and coal ash.

    It mostly contains fine pieces of glass (92 percent) left over from the recycling process, along with ceramic materials, plastic, paper, and ash.

    Based on bricks produced in their lab, they estimated that “each firing cycle led to a potential value of up to $158,460 through a reduction of 417 tonnes of CO2, resulting from a 9.5 percent reduction in firing temperature.” So basically, if a manufacturer switches from regular clay bricks to energy-smart bricks, it will end up saving thousands of dollars on its power bill, and its kilns will release less CO2 into Earth’s atmosphere.

    “Bricks characterized by low thermal conductivity contribute to efficient heat storage and absorption, creating a cooler environment during summer and a warmer comfort during winter.

    This advantage translates into energy savings for air conditioning, benefiting the occupants of the house or building,” the study authors explained.

    Tests conducted by the researchers suggest that the residents of a single-story house built using energy-smart bricks will save up to 5 percent on their energy bills compared to those living in a house made with regular clay bricks.


    The original article contains 454 words, the summary contains 211 words. Saved 54%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!