I’ve been using PFSense for years, and it’s been pretty great, but I also have some friends who are homelabbers that like their Unifi setups.

What do you guys prefer, and why?

  • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    I use UniFi for switches and AP, it doesn’t make sense to use something else for gateway, not even the AmpliFi or EdgeRouter product lines. Single pane of smooth glass to manage everything in one place.

    • root@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve heard of this setup before. I had thought of using PFSense + UniFi Apps/ Switch, but haven’t pulled the trigger on it yet

  • seang96@spgrn.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Pfsense got some bad blood for doing shady things to make opnsense look bad. Beyond that, Unifi management is easy to set up and less to mess around with and has auto updates if you keep the contoller up and enable it.when I used opnsense and pfsense even, I left it out of date since I wasn’t following for updates, and it was a lot more micro managing than I wanted to on a router even though I knew how.

    Got time? Want to learn networking? Want more advanced configs? Go wih opnsense/pfsense

    Want to have time to do other things? Unifi

    Edit: also not sure if pfsense or opnsense does, but unifi has the best rated local integration with controller and home assistant. Easy reboot of PoE devices, monitoring PoE power usage, transmission rates on ports, automation, enabling scheduling WiFi networks or security settings, presence detection by tracking peoples phones connected to the WiFi, etc.

  • seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ruckus APs and Opnsense have been solidly reliable for me for 5y now. No random fucking with unifi bugs (like having my WPA enterprise SSID punting users out onto the management vlan at random instead of the Kerberos assigned VLAN for that user, thanks unifi) and fantastic wireless coverage has me completely satisfied with my infra choices. Also, Ruckus unleashed handles controller duty on the primary AP rather than requiring a management container, that’s also a plus.

  • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ubiquiti has had outages in the past that meant you couldn’t manage the equipment right in front of you.

    Even discounting the potential security implications of that kind of management, the rage I would feel in that situation is enough that I while my AP is nice, works great, I will never use any of their gateways.

    I’m using a 2.5g protectli with OPNSense now, and it’s easy to manage, and all local.

    • root@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh interesting. So you can’t manage Ubiquiti devices without an Internet connection? TIL

      • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        You can manage them as long as you have access to your controller. If you’re using the controller hosted in their cloud, then you’re beholden to their outages. Some gateways cannot use your own controller, so be mindful when selecting your gears.

        • root@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ah got it. I was looking at the UDM Pro. Is that a router and a controller? If so, I should be able to access locally I’d hope

          • psykon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            I got a UDM SE. The controller runs on the device itself and can be used locally, without a Internet connection or Ubiquity account (i’ve only ever set up a local admin account on the controller).

            It works great for me. UDM + 4 switches and 2 AP. All unify, I like the interface. But I’m also only doing basic stuff.

            I’ve had a pfsense based setup in the past and liked it. Now that I got 10gb ftth, the UDM SE ticked all the boxes and I went with a full unify setup with the switch to 10gbit. Happy with it so far.

      • BlueTardis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you are concerned it’s pretty easy to setup your own controller.

        Only needs to be running for management. Make a local vm

      • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        You can manage them as long as you have access to your controller. Unifi outages are only an issue if you’re paying for their cloud based controller instead of running it locally.

    • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s only if you’re using their cloud management BS.

      If you’re running it locally it doesn’t rely on any external systems.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Pfsense all the way. I have a couple of unifi 10GB switches downstream acting as dumb switches. I’m happy.

  • eldereko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I use pfSense on a Protectli vault with a Unifi Pro switch and Unifi AP. it all works great. I prefer pfSense over the full unified UDM gateway, pfSense appears to offer more features and plugins. but I haven’t played with the unifi gateway myself. also a lot cheaper

  • Grandsinge@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I used pFSense for years until Netgate took over. That is when I switched to OPNSense (maybe 2019/2020, don’t remember excatly). Since then, I’ve had OPNSense (runnign on a Lenovo m720q tiny) and Unifi (APs and UNVR) for wireless and cameras. I like this setup, it gives me all the advanced routing features I want and have become accustomed. I’m sure Unifi routers are good for most use cases and would have the added convenience of one interface for everything. However, I’ve not been impressed with price to performance ratios for their past offerings (ie. the routing capabilities of OPNsense with an i5 CPU and option for swapping a quad port 1gbe nic to a dual port 10gbe nic) is hard to compete against. That said, the UDM-SE looks interesting.

  • keyez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have a UDMPro I got 2 years ago i believe. Had a netgate SG3100 with PFsense for 6 years before that until the sg3100 hardware and support went EOL. Was happy with both but went with the UDMPro to be able to support the camera systems and was comparable to another netgate device but was about $100 cheaper with a $50 promo. I mostly use it locally and via app at some points.

    Just within the last 2 years the UDMs finally got equivalent features to my setup with PFsense. Wireguard and per port GeoIP restrictions and logging were the most used features on my PFsense that from videos and forums didn’t seem like it was added to unifi stuff until just the last couple years.