• grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Remember that time the NYT published Judith Miller’s stenography for the Bush Administration’s lies leading up to the war in Iraq? I’m sure they learned their lesson from that debacle, though.

    I wonder what Media Bias Fact Check has to say about them?

    Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER

    Factual Reporting: HIGH

    Country: USA

    Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE

    Media Type: Newspaper

    Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic

    MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

    What a goddamned joke.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      The NYT was shitty long before that. They famously did not cover the Holocaust. Not the run up, and not even during the war.

      When the camps were liberated, Americans at home had no idea who was in the camps.

      The owner of the NYT was later asked about their failures in covering the Holocaust and the buildup, and said with a shrug “the NYT didn’t really cover the Holocaust”.

      As a note the owner of the NYT was Jewish. But didn’t want to be associated with poor Jews.

    • AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I really wish Rooki would listen to the community about this silly bot. But they won’t, and their staunch defense in the face of criticism suggests an ulterior motive.

      Tinfoil hat time: I think they got a Ground News sponsor for Lemmy (GN started an ad campaign just as this started) and are trying to look unbiased by having both GN and MBFC… in every single news post.

      • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah I had a similar feeling about ground news. I had assumed the bot was at least created by someone who works there, using whatever algorithm that site uses to rate sources. The fact that’s it’s mentioned in every post really rubs me the wrong way, on top of how shitty the bot is at doing what it’s supposed to. And yet, it’s still around. What do we have to do to finally get rid of it?

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      They also kept doubling down on their reporting of systemic sexual violence on Oct 7. Family members of the victims disputed that sexual violence was a component of their murders. They have not retracted this reporting.

    • Asafum
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The “great” part about how absolute shit NYT is, is how after the “great media consolidation” ~15 years ago when most of the major outlets were bought by billionaires the first thing they did was cut their investigation and research departments in favor of “copying” the NYT stories…

      They don’t care about quality, or content, they’re the typical business school jackass type that thinks “ThE BrAnD mEAnS eVeRyThInG!” As in: you’ll eat whatever I serve and you’ll keep doing it because of the name I bought.

      Same shit is happening with so called “AAA” game developers (Bethesda… Among others) except this isn’t fucking clothing. Gucci sells because people want the name. The Washington Post can go fuck themselves, no one but Bezos cares about the name.