Disappointed to be wrong, but intrigued about further developments coming from these findings

    • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not entirely convinced it was a con job, I think there was lack of academic rigor and the researchers that published were deeply overworked and underprepared. Publish or perish leads to mistakes on this scale or worse being published and accepted as fact dozens of times over on a daily basis.

      • Deadend [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There was a race to publish by different people involved. That’s why I mean self-con. They were in such a rush to be THE GUY.