• orenishii
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you replace capitalism in that sentence with another ism you still have the same results.

    • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Not really.

      The fundamental critique of capitalism is that not even the capitalists are really in charge. Marx lays out quite thoroughly in Capital that the profit motive is what’s actually in charge, and the capitalists are just along for the ride, and that any attempt by the capitalists to flex their power in a way that the market cannot abide will result in them losing their privileged status and being replaced by a different capitalist who will better serve the needs of the profit motive.

      By contrast, socialist systems are run by people. That makes them flexible and able to serve the needs of society in a way that capitalist societies simply aren’t. And yes, people are capable of mistakes, failure, and betrayal; but so too are they capable of insight, success, and solidarity. The best of existing socialist societies past and present is when they buck the demands of the market and provide for their people in ways that capitalist societies don’t, and the worst of socialist societies is invariably the things that they are required to do in order to maintain their existence on a predominantly capitalist world.