An erra is to come to an end as the Eu says enough is enough and introduces new rules and hefty fines.

  • LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Rather than waiting around for the legal system to nanny me, I’ve gone ahead and committed to only purchase hardware that does not attempt to restrict me.

    • Rob200@lemmy.autism.placeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Such as Android, (which some these restrictions seem to be coming to Android to to an extent.)

  • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    What does it mean to “open up” an operating system in this context? Do they mean something like the possibility to intall other OSes on their devices, or that the app stores needs to be more open? I’m guessing it does not mean they have to start open source:ing parts of the OS… or?

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Probably to allow proper sideloading of apps, instead of the contrived bullshit they already tried to pull.

      • helenslunch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        What they’ve done can be described as nothing other than malicious non-compliance and the EU has been dragging their feet on enforcement.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I would love if device makers were forced to open up their hardware to other OSs. Unlockable bootloaders for all as well as allowing users to install their own signing keys so secure boot can remain enabled.

      Granted, there would still be black box firmware required to use half the components inside, but that’s another battle.

      • kayazere
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        14 hours ago

        This should be a right of the consumer that purchased the hardware. Same goes for gaming consoles. You used to be able to officially install Linux on a PlayStation.

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          “But we’re selling the hardware at a loss, so letting you own what you paid for would break our crappy business model” /s

        • bizarroland@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I’d be okay with it even if it were on a time delay.

          Like if device manufacturers had to publish their software in order to no longer officially support the device that would be a welcome compromise and at least a step in the right direction right?

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yeah agreed to an extent but I would say a massive portion of those who installed linux attempted to pirate games. It makes sense to block it.

          I’d prefer to mandate that they allow other stores on the consoles or mandate no advertisements or promotions on the console.

    • Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      We are talking about lawmakers making this demand. They don’t have a fucking clue what the difference is between all these possibilities.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      From the last paragraph, it sounds like the intent is to make it easier to switch devices and services, which would be great

  • demesisx@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Let’s go one further and compel Apple, Microsoft, and Google to open source their entire operating systems. :)

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I am almost certain there would be two major impacts from that. The first being that operating system development would slow to the pace that the community wishes instead of having big money behind it. And the second is that security updates would come quite a bit faster.

      Edit: I figure brand new major features would be slower in coming. But security would be improved.

      • Drusenija@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        I figure brand new major features would be slower in coming. But security would be improved.

        I feel there’s going to be an element of “old man yells at cloud” here, but that isn’t inherently a bad thing. I just use Windows at work at the moment but there’s very little I do in Windows that I couldn’t do as far back as Windows XP as long as driver support kept up. I don’t use it for the OS, the OS just enables me to use the applications I need.

        Same with MacOS. I know Apple always act like every minor enhancement is the greatest thing ever (look, we added Tabs to Finder 🤩), but ultimately the OS is there to act as the pathway between my applications and my hardware.

        If the focus switched from features to security, would we really lose anything of value? At a minimum I wouldn’t have family contacting me cause their PC looks different than it did previously (looking at you centralised Windows taskbar 👀).

      • nfms@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The operating system that runs most servers, a lot of them doing web cloud and networking, with high levels of security (developed by security companies) is open source, the *BSD distributions and also Linux.
        But I also have doubts if this is the right move.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          But I also have doubts if this is the right move

          Can you share those and the reasoning, please?

  • Rob200@lemmy.autism.placeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Hey comment section I forgot to add the URL to this post before posting it earlier today, I added it in now.

  • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Apple opening up would makes to mean toward them more. Still, I’m only going to get a new phone after 2026, after the EU’s battery mandate in force.