The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Facepalm@lemmy.world · 2 days agoCyberpunk dystopialemmy.worldimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1613arrow-down121
arrow-up1592arrow-down1imageCyberpunk dystopialemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Facepalm@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareRob Bos@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down2·1 day agoSomething that might happen once in ten years isn’t worth the additional security surface exposure. IMO
minus-squarecynar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 day agoI have a small child. It’s not just mechanical failure. Then again, I’ve got a separate network for IoT things. They can’t see anything by each other and their controller. Unfortunately, most of the IoT appliances do NOT like this setup.
minus-squarelegion02@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 day agoWhat security exposure? Any modern router has a way to isolate iot devices. I’m risking people knowing when I open my fridge?
minus-squareRob Bos@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 day agoMost people wouldn’t bother. And the risk would be more a foothold into your network as a staging point to attack other devices, as I’m sure you know .
Something that might happen once in ten years isn’t worth the additional security surface exposure. IMO
I have a small child. It’s not just mechanical failure. Then again, I’ve got a separate network for IoT things. They can’t see anything by each other and their controller. Unfortunately, most of the IoT appliances do NOT like this setup.
What security exposure? Any modern router has a way to isolate iot devices. I’m risking people knowing when I open my fridge?
Most people wouldn’t bother.
And the risk would be more a foothold into your network as a staging point to attack other devices, as I’m sure you know .