I wonder how they managed to tell a complex story like that before the invention of writing?

  • Fontasia
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The caputalisa of “Site Much Older Than” makes me think this person has attempted to trademark the phrase.

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    but hasnt every story from the bible been found in earlier scripts like from qumran already? not a single word in the bible is not some enhanced copy of an older story already found elsewhere. religion is so sad.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The dead sea scrolls are old manuscripts, including several Bible books, but they date after most of those books were written.

      The dead sea scrolls date from 3rd century BCE to 1st century CE. At that time, most of the OT had been finalized. The value of the scrolls is that they are hard copies of these books that are a lot older than previous copies we had.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Unlike all of those true books in the Bible like the one with the talking snake and the one with the guy who came back from the dead?

      • Volkditty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Yes, because this one was immediately recognized as BS and the guy who wrote it was sentenced to 3 years hard labour in gaol. So not even a good fake.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    There has never been a flood myth in any culture before the bible. I can prove it. NANANANANA-I-CAN’T-HEAR-YOU-NANANANANA! /s