• LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    THIS, 1,000%! Third Party doesn’t have a huge presence in the USA, only because people don’t do the work to get it there. It requires a lot of work that should be done just after the new sitting president is elected. Building a recognizable platform with proper support takes a lot of effort. It would be worth it, though, to truly support the people in ways which a two party system cannot. Holding the President and other people in power accountable with sensible words and meaningful action would get a party to gradually become a household name.

    After I vote for Kamala, this is what I will be looking into. Finding a third party (one with aims to support everyone, no matter gender, sexuality, etc).

    • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      You should definitely add wealth class to your list of criteria, as this is a factor that both Dems and Reps fail to address.

      • LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I should, it wasn’t the most immediate thought in my head; Republicans openly court the wealthy for donations, while most Dems (there are a few outspoken individuals that try) fail to curtail the power wealthy people have in US politics. Wealth Class is certainly a good addition to my list of criteria, as those who are less wealthy and are outright poor often have no voice in the political space. Unless they really create a proper spectacle which can’t be ignored.