• sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Russell is one of the greats. But if you’re looking for a terse knockdown there’s always this classic from author Max Reger:

    I am in the smallest room of the house. I have your review in front of me. Soon it will be behind me.

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    210
    ·
    23 hours ago

    This one is even better than Tolkien’s response to a German publisher in 1938, asking for proof of his ancestry, which may or may not have been sent, but tellingly there was no official translation of The Hobbit into German until 1957.

    Thank you for your letter. I regret that I am not clear as to what you intend by arisch. I am not of Aryan extraction: that is Indo-Iranian; as far as I am aware none of my ancestors spoke Hindustani, Persian, Gypsy, or any related dialects. But if I am to understand that you are enquiring whether I am of Jewish origin, I can only reply that I regret that I appear to have no ancestors of that gifted people. My great-great-grandfather came to England in the eighteenth century from Germany: the main part of my descent is therefore purely English, and I am an English subject—which should be sufficient. I have been accustomed, nonetheless, to regard my German name with pride, and continued to do so throughout the period of the late regrettable war, in which I served in the English army. I cannot, however, forbear to comment that if impertinent and irrelevant inquiries of this sort are to become the rule in matters of literature, then the time is not far distant when a German name will no longer be a source of pride.

    Your enquiry is doubtless made in order to comply with the laws of your own country, but that this should be held to apply to the subjects of another state would be improper, even if it had (as it has not) any bearing whatsoever on the merits of my work or its sustainability for publication, of which you appear to have satisfied yourselves without reference to my Abstammung.

    Don’t fuck with posh and emotionally repressed Oxbridge motherfuckers when they realize they are finally on the right side of history. 🤣

  • mEEGal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Dude’s a fookin legend !

    In the early 1900’s, he discovered a logical paradox that shattered mathematics for years, and drove brilliant people literally insane (one of them died in an asylum later on).

    He then tried to redefine mathematics based solely on logic; but he failed after a 1000-page manuscript… and that was only the first half of what he intended to publish.

    There are countless valuable quotes by him and anecdotes, he’s a very inspirational man.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Unrelated, genuine question: Why do some people write “fookin”?

      Is it just for fun?
      Do you pronounce it that way?

      I personally write “fucking” and rarely “fuckin”.

      Just curious.

      • Akasazh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I think it’s use is popularized by the tv show ‘Peaky Blinders’ with the Birmingham pronunciation of the word.

        Some have accustomed themselves of writing a bit more cautious, as multiple platforms have active swear detection (not the reason to use it on Lemmy, but there were are).

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I thought it was to emphasize that they are Australian, but that’s just because of a character in a book that I read.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    22 hours ago

    With all due respect, you are the antithesis of all that I consider human. With all due respect.

    By the way, if anyone else was curious, dude was a “Sir” due to an inherited title, not knighted for individual actions.

  • zante@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    23 hours ago

    If you want to understand how to crush your foes with English, read Russell.

    It’s dated, and ancient compared to the shit we spew, but it soo pure and clear (when you get the ear for it).

    I am not a scholar, I can’t analyse prose or poetry, but his writing is cleansing and lights up the brain - especially if you have a fetish for reasonableness.

    • Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I have a Bachelor’s degree in Philosophy and I found myself loving Russell and Mill because there’s no pompousness to their writing. A lot of philosophers use very flowery language that’s hard to parse, but Russell just gets straight to the point, clear as day.
      In my opinion, philosophy should be written clearly so anyone can understand it (looking at you, Heidegger)

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It’s dated, and ancient compared to the shit we spew, but it soo pure and clear (when you get the ear for it).

      I am not a scholar, I can’t analyse prose or poetry, but his writing is cleansing and lights up the brain - especially if you have a fetish for reasonableness.

      I know exactly what you mean and I’ve never quite had the words to describe this type of writing. It’s definitely old fashioned to our eyes, but it’s so dense with meaning. I felt the same reading some of the landmark SCOTUS decisions of the Warren court during the civil rights era.

  • zante@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Russell is the GOAT. If he was taught in schools, we would be living in paradise.

  • parody@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Dear Sir,

    Thank you for your letter and for your enclosed pizza menu suggestions. I have given some thought to our recent correspondence about topping choices. It is always difficult to decide on how to respond to people whose culinary ethos is so alien and, in fact, repellent to one’s own. It is not that I take exception to the general points made by you about pizza toppings, but that every ounce of my energy has been devoted to an active opposition to cruel fruit placement, compulsive sweetness, and the sadistic persecution of traditional savory flavors which has characterised the philosophy and practice of pineapple-on-pizza advocacy.

    I feel obliged to say that the gastronomic universes we inhabit are so distinct, and in deepest ways opposed, that nothing fruitful or sincere could ever emerge from a shared pizza between us.

    I should like you to understand the intensity of this conviction on my part. It is not out of any attempt to be rude that I say this but because of all that I value in Italian culinary experience and pizza-making achievement.

    Yours sincerely,

    What are the chances I had just sent something similar to someone advocating for pineapple on pizza?

    Jokes aside - dude was pretty badass:

    Bertrand Arthur William Russell, 3rd Earl Russell, OM, FRS (18 May 1872 – 2 February 1970) was a British philosopher, logician, mathematician, and public intellectual. He had influence on mathematics, logic, set theory, and various areas of analytic philosophy.

    👑