Xatolos@reddthat.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 29 days agoWinamp deletes entire GitHub source code repo after a rocky few weeksarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square116fedilinkarrow-up1533arrow-down14cross-posted to: technik@feddit.orgtechnology@hexbear.nethackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up1529arrow-down1external-linkWinamp deletes entire GitHub source code repo after a rocky few weeksarstechnica.comXatolos@reddthat.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 29 days agomessage-square116fedilinkcross-posted to: technik@feddit.orgtechnology@hexbear.nethackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squareP4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·29 days agoIs this real?
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·28 days agoNo, sorry, it’s a jab about how no one paid for WinRAR either.
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·28 days agoWinRAR did make piles of money by focusing on the commercial market. They really didn’t care if home users went past the free trial period, but they did care if you were a business. I don’t know what WinAmp does, or ever did.
minus-squaremckean@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·29 days agoReal player is more of an alternative to winamp, I was surprised to see real.com. So no…
Is this real?
No, sorry, it’s a jab about how no one paid for WinRAR either.
WinRAR did make piles of money by focusing on the commercial market. They really didn’t care if home users went past the free trial period, but they did care if you were a business.
I don’t know what WinAmp does, or ever did.
Real player is more of an alternative to winamp, I was surprised to see real.com. So no…
I’m thinking no.