something for you libs who still believe in electoralism

  • Smeagolicious [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 years ago

    Whether or not you think that a Biden vote is harm reduction, the portrayal of the non voter/third party voter argument as “buh buh buh revolution…?” is pretty tired. When Joe has promised to be tougher on the “enemies” of the US than Trump, had credible allegations of rape against him, and has also blamed China for the virus… I’m just sick of all the left adjacent super popular breadtubers calling people’s reasonable trepidations about voting "larping ". You can make arguments for harm reduction, this video isn’t that.

  • thelasthoxhaist [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    well i finish it, bad video overall, made weak attemps to try to get the left to vote by saying that biden will move left on the issues that matter and its mostly to give morale to the libs so they move seas and mountains to VOTE even with the voter suppresion

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Making a strawman called Tabi-Chan to deride for an entire video while talking down to them endlessly really strikes me as incredibly stuck up and divisive. It does not strike me as convincing. It does not strike me as a good way to reach out and convince people.

    The only people this will appeal to are the people that already agree with it. The people it is trying to ““convince”” are going to just look at it and be offended by the shamelessly offensive caricature Contra is presenting of them.

    This is a grift. She is pandering to her audience while shamelessly aiming to trigger the people the video claims it wants to convince.

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        Yes and the video has succeeded in its intention – to trigger us into sharing. It has done fuck all to convince anyone other than people that already agreed with it.

        It’s all about getting more shares. Contra doesn’t actually give a fuck about meaningfully affecting the election in any way, she has just solely made this for grift.

  • ssjmarx [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    it’s pretty telling that her list of things that Hillary wouldn’t have done that Trump did was literally 100% symbolic actions.

    I feel like a certain part of Twitter gets way too mad at ContraPoints over the most specious shit imaginable, but if she gets dunked on for her lukewarm takes in this video she deserves it. im gonna vote gloria la riva, and I suggest you do too.

  • Owl [he/him]@hexbear.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 years ago

    Sorry, I’m going to have to close this thread because it breaks the !videos comm rules. As you can clearly see in the sidebar, this place is “Breadtube if it didn’t suck.”

  • vanityfairz [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 years ago

    No idea who this video is made for, libs who follow her are already voting and if you’re already not going to vote for Biden I fail to see how any argument she makes will change your mind

  • AntifaSleeperCell [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    I mean, its just kind of lazy compared to her other videos. She doesn’t really address stuff like third-party voting, things proposed outside of voting apart from revolution (which many certainly do clamour for in spite of the lack of organization), the root of where the online conversation around it comes from (the liberal mythologizing of voting for dems as our only political and social power), or many historical conversations surrounding lesser evilism outside just this election (like the essays by hunter s thompson or web dubois). Her Tabby character really only gives one argument throughout the video; it seems as if her portrayal of incels and transphobes are deeper than leftists? Nothing against her and I still stan but this vid is just kind of low effort because it doesn’t add anything new to the conversation and really only barely even interacts with the discourse surrounding voting.

    Also I feel like she hasn’t really put out any really deeply meditated vids in a year or so tbh.

    • thelasthoxhaist [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      its low effort because breadtube is making Vote biden content so they dont anger the libs who will blame and call anyone a trump supporter, they dont want to lose they patreon support

  • fuschiaRuler [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 years ago

    Just finished and all i can think is that “breadtube” is now collectively trying to backpedal their propaganda efforts (just somemorenews and now contra that i know of). But for this vid specifically, it felt like a shitty, forced “debunk” of leftist talking points when it comes to apathy for voting.

  • star_wraith [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Natalie, if you want to vote for Biden, great. Do it. It’s just… not going to matter. It won’t matter if Trump or Biden is president. I mean Jesus, Biden isn’t even proposing to fully repeal Trump’s tax cuts despite them being overwhelmingly unpopular. Oh sure he came up with a “climate plan” after he got the nomination but if he even gets 5% of it passed I’ll eat my hat. You and I both know even if the Dems win both houses of congress and the presidency, they’ll pass a few window-dressing measures about strengthening institutions, but otherwise they’ll sit on their hands for 2 years until Republicans come in and take both houses back.

    Biden wins and we make zero progress on climate change, health care, income inequality, policing, LGBTQ rights, etc. Virtually no one’s material conditions will be different in 4 years whether Trump is president or Biden is. It doesn’t matter. I’m voting for Howie ostensibly because I want to send a message about the importance of climate change but even I admit it’s pretty weak and won’t really do anything. I’m voting because it makes me feel good to support leftist candidates where I can and there are some propositions/amendments in my state that actually matter.

  • Saif [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    I think the issue with “harm reduction” rhetoric is that it starts with the conceit that the argument they’re having with leftists is “Biden is no different”, and thus they want to convince you that he will reduce harm somehow. But actually, no, I don’t think there’s no difference if he’d win, that’s actually not true.

    I think things would be worse, way way worse.

    From a materialist perspective, a Biden presidency would strangle any revolutionary energy in its womb by using the overwhelming power of the State to co-opt and neuter the leftist struggle, all the while prosecuting the most radical actors to the fullest extent. His administration will reverse any gains socialism has made in the public eye, take us back to a time when the struggle was hidden behind an esoteric veil. Whereas Trump prevents any avenue from being pursued other than open warfare. His presence gets everyone out of the woodworks, it makes things clear to the average disaffected proletarian that there are only two options, socialism or barbarism, and the liberals struggle to make themselves relevant in the paradigm.

    Liberals time and time again keep pressuring the left wing of America into voting, they think of you as complete fucking suckers, they have zero incentive to do anything for you if you keep going along with it. They have to suffer consequences, people are unable to learn unless they actually have consequences. And no I don’t think that will make them turn around and start offering socialist policy, I think they’re stuck repeating this cycle until we sink into the ocean, but each time it happens they lose more and more relevancy and the State loses more and more legitimacy. It’s the natural course of things, it is something we have to confront, and I’m tired of pretending it’s not going to come to a head.

    • thelasthoxhaist [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      Americans arent part of the International proletariat by maoist standards, so most times they really need a outside force to push them to radicalization

      • Saif [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 years ago

        I agree, I myself am not an American, and that’s part of why this discourse is so frustrating because I can see a picture much larger than America, and I hate how much mental energy both online and in the global media is dedicated to whether the blue man or the red man should be in the white building during the period of time that the stupid fucking country collapses. Any material difference should be put towards answering the question of which man allows this to come to a head quicker because the country needs to stop existing as soon as possible for the betterment of the world, and honestly, Biden will just delay that.

        • thelasthoxhaist [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          yeah, ever since i been into international politics, back when i was a centrist i was worry The USA would cause a war in latin america just like they did in the middle east and watch as decades of progress banish away and the region destabilizes because some man in washington didnt like that countries leader