lysdexic@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoThe Top Programming Languages 2023spectrum.ieee.orgexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up169arrow-down13cross-posted to: eric_posts_urls@discuss.onlinehackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partybecomeme@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up166arrow-down1external-linkThe Top Programming Languages 2023spectrum.ieee.orglysdexic@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square30fedilinkcross-posted to: eric_posts_urls@discuss.onlinehackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partybecomeme@sh.itjust.works
minus-squareImpossibleRubiksCube@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-21 year agodeleted by creator
minus-squaretatterdemalion@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoYea I’m mostly poking fun. You don’t even need script embedding for Turing Completeness. But I don’t consider DSLs as general purpose languages, as by definition they are not intended to be used that way.
deleted by creator
Yea I’m mostly poking fun. You don’t even need script embedding for Turing Completeness. But I don’t consider DSLs as general purpose languages, as by definition they are not intended to be used that way.