• ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    She probably got paid like $4 an hour to serve people food.

    You’re not wrong for not tipping $5. She wasn’t wrong for wanted/needing/hoping for a 33% tip.

    The employer is likely in the wrong for running a restaurant where it’s staff are specifically underpaid to put the burden on their customers to pay them so don’t go broke/stay broke.

    • drekly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      So don’t work that job. Shit pay should result in nobody working there.

      It shouldn’t result in an expectation of the customers to pay your wage in an unspoken random amount on top of their bill

      • Shapillon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        don’t work that job

        Unionizing across the industry and striking would go a longer way towards that goal.

        And it shouldn’t result in workers being paid an unlivable wage but here we are…

      • hoodatninja@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        So don’t work that job. Shit pay should result in nobody working there.

        Oh yeah everyone can just go to the job store and get a new job at-will and there are absolutely no external factors that could impact that. Clearly they work for minimum wage + tips at a thankless job serving people like you out of their passion for the work.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It shouldn’t, no. But there’s a $2.13 an hour minimum wage for tipped employees. Employers have to fill the gap to $7.25 if tips don’t cover it, but the simple matter is the law facilitates the expectation customers pay tips.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is there some world where the cost of increasing employee pay isn’t also going to “burden” the customer with commensurate higher costs for the service/goods? Getting rid of tipping is a fine idea for many reasons, but not because it’s a cost burden for customers. The customer will partially pay the wages of employees for services they use and goods they consume, either through tipping or increased costs.

      The reasons to get rid of tipping is not to save customers money.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The burden I meant wasn’t the money spent itself but the responsibility to cover it directly.

        In the context of wages not rising with the costs of living, employers increasingly are passing the responsibility to pay their tipped employees onto consumers, intentionally or not.

        If the employer pays their employees a living wage and increases their costs, then they are taking direct responsibility. In that environment you don’t even need to eliminate tipping. Tips would be the bonuses they’re (culturally) intended to be.

        • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you’re not even actually talking about tipping at all. You’re just saying you want a minimum wage to be a living wage. Unless you’re implying that minimum wages jobs that don’t pay a living wage and that you don’t expect to tip are fine, and I’m confident that’s not what you mean.