• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because the vast majority of times people complain about this stuff, they have no idea what they’re talking about.

    If you buy a nice TV and spend 2 seconds going thru the options you won’t have a single issue OP is complaining about.

    Edit:

    Apparently OP banned me for saying their meme doesn’t make sense…

    The only thing that a “cheap” TV would do is slow down overtime, because it’s cheap and has the absolute bare minimum processing speed.

    You need that processing speed to properly up sample to 4k from streaming.

    If you want a cheap one, buy a decent 1080p so it doesn’t have to upsample.

    Rtings.com is a good resource.

    But it should be common sense that buying a cheap product will give you poorer results.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why should you have to buy a nice TV for this issue to not be an issue? Why should shitty TVs have built-in advertising and glacially slow “smart” functions? Either don’t include that as TV software or fix it.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Capitalism baby!

        They want to make the same profit no matter the product you’re buying. On nice TVs they make it by making more profits on the sale, on cheap TVs they make it by selling ads.

        The reason the cheap TV is cheap is also because it’s using (even) older hardware so it’s no wonder they’re slow…

      • xander255@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The price of the TV is subsidized by the ads, promoted apps, and usage tracking. But usually poor hardware to keep the cost even lower. That’s why the models with Fire TV OS and similar ones are usually the cheapest.

          • TyrionsNose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            TVs have improved in quality since smart TVs we’re introduced. However, it’s kind of like everything else. They have stopped producing the old dumb stuff.

            It’s another reason why I advocate that we should compensated anytime our personal information is used or harvested.

            • Throwaway@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Quality? Built in apps when a roku is 30 bucks? Is that whats so expensive?

          • Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I couldn’t get a TV anywhere near the size of the roku for the same price. 350 bucks for something 3x as large as a 400 dollar boob tube in 2002. Also it still has no ads.

    • Muehe@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apparently OP banned me for saying their meme doesn’t make sense…

      I don’t think OP can ban you, just block you. And considering in this comment you implied they are stupid, while in your other comment you implied they are straight up lying, it wouldn’t surprise me.

    • WormFood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      unhelpful and rude comment. the only advice you have to offer is ‘buy an expensive tv’. do you think people buy cheaper tvs out of ignorance?

      • newDayRocks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Partially, yes they do.

        It’s been years since the black Friday secret about TVs have been spread on the internet, yet people will still but them. A cheap TV with our without ads will suck because you get what you pay for.

        Also the meme is obviously overexaggerating because it’s being memey. Most TVs don’t restart on their own for example, or get slowed down by updates. If you have any specific examples please share and shame the models.

        • AProfessional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The top 2/3 of the Home Screen is ads. A big Sponsored tile plus a row of “Top picks for you” which includes sponsored content.

          They also store your watch data.

    • Jay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Andriod tv’s take a long time to boot because they literally have to boot an operating system when they fire up, there’s no way around that in any settings.

      That said, I don’t have any of the other issues because my tv has never had net access and I have a pc with wireless keyboard/mouse hooked to it, and typing this while sitting on my couch.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      My grandparents have a cheap 2014 1080p LG LCD webOS TV that they never connected to the internet but it is and always was very slow, and the LED backlight became dull blue in places. Our dumb CCFL-backlit 2007 768p Sony Bravia has <100 ms response time in menus as opposed to 1~5 s, and is awesome with a Linux HTPC (which frankly should get an upgrade to an SSD but no big deal – I can still start streaming any major movie in <3 minutes).