• loathesome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    What’s with the whole “structural damage because of the fire” thing? Is there a reason why mentioned that or was he just being a smartass?

      • loathesome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sorry but what is the narrative here? I know there are some conspiracy theories about involving fire (jet fuel and steel beams). This this related to that?

        • PolPotPie [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          10 months ago

          idk i’m not fully versed or sold on the conspiracies (ie: controlled demolition), but if we are to believe this guy is being handled to give this statement, I would guess he emphasizes “damage caused by fire leading to collapse” to provide eye-witness testimony to the Official Account, and deter people from seeking alternate explanations

    • GaveUp [she/her]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      He probably said that confidently like it was an undisputable fact to convince watchers of this story he was telling for whatever reason