I am already self-hosting a lot of things for 15+ years now, including git, but I am looking for a solution like Github that is federalized (not Gitlab or the like).

I want people to be able to open issues, PRs, comment, fork or star without having to create an account on my server. Is there anything like that?

I saw radicle.xyz but I am not sure if that is what I want. Basically a lightweight git+ActivityPub + web frontend is what I am looking for. I think. No CI/CD or other fancy features required.

    • eodur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, the protocol is called ForgeFed and from what I recall it will be added to Forgejo, then ported upstream to Gitea. Supposedly GitLab has commented on adopting it in the future as well.

    • pirofti@iusearchlinux.fyiOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it not a big no-no to use Gitea now since the commercial takeover? From what I understand, Forgejo is the safe option and I am glad to hear from the other comments that it is getting support for that through ForgeFed!

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That is a bit hyperbole. The domains and trademarks where transferred to a for-profit entity (owned by the main devs) and all that was done in relative secrecy which didn’t go down well with the open-source community.

          However for the time being nothing much changed and Forgejo is more of a “just in case” soft-fork.

        • lz0@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          AFAIK Gitea incorporated as a for-profit (which was supported), but there was some perceived(not intended to throw shade on any side here, just keeping it neutral) shady-ness from the perspective of the community. You can read more here in the open letter: https://gitea-open-letter.coding.social/

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There was some drama with the main Forgejo developer that caused a bunch of drama and prompted him to “reboot” the community. I found it on HN a while back, but the drama itself happened in issues and discussions under the Forgejo project.

  • AnonymousLlama@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I know we’re using codeberg for kbin.social

    It’s been a pretty decent experience so far, similar to GitHub but a little more basic. The markdown editor is my biggest gripe so far, it has weird backspace handling on mobile

    • thejoker8814@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Codeberg is using Forgejo, basically Gitea. You can change the editor, if you like with other editors if you host Forgejo or Gitea yourself. Features like CI/CD can be deactivated.

  • pim
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think a federated version control system makes so much sense and I hope it will break open GitHub’s (nearly) monopoly.

    • pirofti@iusearchlinux.fyiOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Completely agree! Please note that git itself is federated, well distributed, it’s the rest of the stuff on top that needs to be fixed.