• Bell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    84
    ·
    8 months ago

    Imagine spending $100/day solely on your child. This is a crazy amount of money already, why is everyone upset?

    • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Oh, you must be unaware of who this is. He is (or was, we’ll see after his Xitter debacle) actually one of the richest men on the planet, and despite being able to pay thousands a day solely on his own child without even noticing, he’s going to great lengths to avoid paying more than the absolute bare minimum for his own child.

      Hope that clears it up.

      • RushingSquirrel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The mother still pays and is very capable of providing. 3k is not the bare minimum when it’s, by decree, the maximum allowed by the state.

        It’s not because you can spend that you should and want to spend your money (I could spend more than I do, I prefer keeping some for emergencies and special projects and investments.

        Texas has a child support limit, but it might not be the only reason he wants to do it the, he might have more chance to keep custody there over California.

        People keep downvoting anyone who is not against Elon Musk, no need to be supportive of him, just simply stating that some arguments against him might be wrong is enough to get downvoted to hell.
        This is just Reddit all over again.

      • Bell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        37
        ·
        8 months ago

        In what world is $2700/month “the absolute bare minimum” for a child? What amount seems reasonable to support a small child?

        Or, more to the point, why is everyone pretending that’s not an outrageous amount?

        • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Because it’s not an outrageous amount if you are one of the richest people on earth. It’s all relative.

        • GutterPunch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          The same world that produced the USDA Expenditures on Children by Families Consumer Expenditure Survey results, in which that amount is similar to other numbers. The US government may or may not have artificially inflated these numbers for intrinsic benefits. Depending on how you slice the numbers or what variables in that child’s life are at play, a child can easily cost more than $2700 a month, but millions of families also raise multiple children simultaneously on less money than that. In the same world where rent prices on 1-2 bedroom places can start upwards from $1500/month, what values do make sense? The answer to that depends on whether we’re talking about Musk or actual people.

    • idiomaddict@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      And on California rent… child support doesn’t need to go directly to your child, groceries and rent/utilities are also considered a valid use