You would still have the same age, gender, personality, skin color, etc. and you would be able to speak at least one local language and would know basic information of the era and place. Your family, social standing, and such would be randomly picked.

    • Akasazh
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sorry to nitpick, but this would be the field of paleontology, not historians.

        • Akasazh
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          If there’s one that could know its you, Livius.

          But as I said it’s a nitpick. Usually us historians keep to when language became involved. The rest would be prehistorical, but the distinction is not that clean cut (is it ever?).