She has two babies, that is three wolves each made up of two wolves inside them: 3*2 or 2+2+2
In your equation, you say 2 (mom) + 2(kid1) + 2(kid2) which has already taken care of the number of wolves (as each has two inside them) — but then you multiply this summation by two, why?
I guess you’re splitting it uo differently but it still doesn’t make sense: you’re saying 2 (mom’s wolves) + 2 (kids) + (2 kids wolves) which covers everything because for each kid there is another wolf which you include in the 3rd 2 of your equation, but then you multiply it by two for some reason.
Even if you were counting the host body as yet another wolf that brings it to 9 not 8.
wouldn’t it be six?
She has two wolves plus two baby wolves
Each baby wolf would also have two wolves.
So 8? Her two inner wolves, the two baby wolves and their two wolves. 2+2+2*2=8
Actually yes, I missed two somehow
You also missed the other infinitely many
Huh??? No it isn’t 8, the fuck?
She has two babies, that is three wolves each made up of two wolves inside them: 3*2 or 2+2+2
In your equation, you say 2 (mom) + 2(kid1) + 2(kid2) which has already taken care of the number of wolves (as each has two inside them) — but then you multiply this summation by two, why?
I guess you’re splitting it uo differently but it still doesn’t make sense: you’re saying 2 (mom’s wolves) + 2 (kids) + (2 kids wolves) which covers everything because for each kid there is another wolf which you include in the 3rd 2 of your equation, but then you multiply it by two for some reason.
Even if you were counting the host body as yet another wolf that brings it to 9 not 8.
Plus the 2 kids are both wolves and inside her.