The justices will review an appellate ruling that revived a charge against three defendants accused of obstruction of an official proceeding. The charge refers to the disruption of Congress’ certification of Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential election victory over Trump.

That’s among four counts brought against Trump in special counsel Jack Smith’s case that accuses the 2024 Republican presidential primary front-runner of conspiring to overturn the results of his election loss. Trump is also charged with conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding.

The court’s decision to weigh in on the obstruction charge could threaten the start of Trump’s trial, currently scheduled for March 4. The justices separately are considering whether to rule quickly on Trump’s claim that he can’t be prosecuted for actions taken within his role as president. A federal judge already has rejected that argument.

  • Nougat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    More abuse of the judicial system. If invading the Capitol building while both houses are in session to count electoral votes after having been directed to do so by the sitting president in order to overturn the election in that sitting president’s favor isn’t “obstructing an official proceeding,” then let’s just burn it all down.

    • uphillbothways@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ah, friend. At the point we’re having this conversation will a bonfire fix anything? Isn’t it too long overdue already? The people and parts that would pick up the pieces afterwards already too poisoned? What hope existed is decades past on multiple fronts. We’re corpses that would dance to music there’s no one left to play.

      • acutfjg
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        You can be a dancing skeleton on your own

  • wellee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    The Supreme Court keeps going outside of their jurisdiction. Something needs to be done about them immediately. They are ruining what little democracy we have.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        There was a supreme court one. Google the 1776 plan. It was foiled only because Trump was not able to convince the capitol police not to use metal detectors on the crowd. They had stockpiled guns in nearby hotel rooms and cars and we’re planning on taking over the capitol, the supreme court, and the Department of State. It was a coup.

        • Fades@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I don’t fuckin care if they have weapons. They’re not here to hurt me. Take the fucking mags away. Let my people in. They can march to the Capitol from here. Let the people in. Take the f***ing mags away,

          • Mango Mussolini
    • Entropywins@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Jack Smith is the one who brought this… I don’t really know his end game on this but I assume he wants to get rid of all avenues of escape for the cheeto.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        People acting like the Court just took it upon themselves to jump in this. Doesn’t work that way.

        I have full faith in Jack Smith. If it’s in any was possible to put Trump in an orange jumpsuit, this is our guy.

        I just wonder what his backup plan is if this fails. NO competent lawyer asks a question he doesn’t know the answer to.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Fuck it, let them make the ruling. Then while Biden is in office just arrest every single republican representative. Its fine now, because of the ruling. Fucken rubes.

    • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      I believe the Trump administration made the legal argument that anything the president does cannot be challenged if he did it in the belief it was necessary for national security, because that is the first and foremost responsibility of the president and the office itself is the ultimate source of that authority. I think it might have been when they cleared out the protestors in DC, but it was that kind of context.

      What I’m wondering is whether that would give Biden the authority to order the arrest of the Supreme Court and members of Congress on the grounds that he believes they’re conducting a conspiracy against the United States and present a threat to the nation and the constitutional order.

      Obviously, I’m just kidding.

      Unless…

  • badbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Don’t forget, by undo, you mean to democracy. If ruling in Trump’s favor, then Biden could immediately declare himself king, and could literally behead his political opponents.

  • sygnius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    As much as I really dislike the current SCOTUS, I do have faith that a majority would understand that if they allow this to continue happening, it would set an extremely dangerous precedent to allow more insurrections without repercussions. The only justice willing to allow this is probably Justice Clarence Thomas. Fuck that guy.