Massachusetts’ law prohibiting the possession and sale of some semiautomatic weapons commonly used in mass shootings is acceptable under a recent change to Second Amendment precedent from the US Supreme Court, a federal judge said Thursday.
Well yeah. My point is the AR-15 isn’t anything special these days. To single it out is irresponsible at best. We need to tackle the general issue of semi-auto rifles with external magazines. Everything else is just performative crap.
Okay but we’ve been here before. They just tried to add more names. To which the gun industry just changed the names. Then they tried to ban certain features. To which the gun industry just built around them.
Until we deal with the heart of the weapon and the reason for it’s combat effectiveness we’ll remain in this cycle.
deleted by creator
That’s great. But they had rifling and accuracy at 300 meters. They had breech loading, and cartridges too. The Army just didn’t want to adopt them.
deleted by creator
Not really. Hold on lemme go get you some examples.
https://www.browning.com/products/firearms/rifles/bar/bar-mk-3-dbm-wood.html
https://www.springfield-armory.com/m1a-series-rifles/
https://hk-usa.com/hk-models/sl8/
deleted by creator
Well yeah. My point is the AR-15 isn’t anything special these days. To single it out is irresponsible at best. We need to tackle the general issue of semi-auto rifles with external magazines. Everything else is just performative crap.
deleted by creator
Okay but we’ve been here before. They just tried to add more names. To which the gun industry just changed the names. Then they tried to ban certain features. To which the gun industry just built around them.
Until we deal with the heart of the weapon and the reason for it’s combat effectiveness we’ll remain in this cycle.