• butt_mountain_69420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      “Pro-eugenics?”

      saying modern life is so comfortable that intelligence is no longer an evolutionary advantage isn’t pro-eugenics, it’s the fucking truth. As far as anti-democracy, I am actually an Arkansas inbred, and my vote against magatardism goes straight in the trash thanks to the electoral college.

      • jackalope@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Intelligence is still very much an evolutionary advantage. Idocracy isn’t science and getting your ideas about evolution from a mark judge film is not a sign of intelligence.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          You’re just asserting something without evidence too.

          You know, generally as wealth increases birth rate decreases. Just look at the population crises coming up around the developed world.

          • jackalope@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Fertility goes down as wealth increases because developed industrial societies don’t use child labor and infant mortality has gone way down. It’s not because intelligence is a disadvantage.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            You know, generally as wealth increases birth rate decreases. Just look at the population crises coming up around the developed world.

            This is the exact opposite of why people are having fewer kids in areas with population crises.

            People generally have fewer kids in developed nations than in developing nations because all of their children are likely to survive.

            Population crises arise due to social and economic factors.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                One can easily make the argument that the children are surviving because of the increased wealth.

                That is the argument, yes

            • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Not sure why you’re downvoted. These are absolutely the reasons. Unfortunately in some developed nations people are worked to death and buried under debt so they decide not to have kids, or are simply not left with a choice at all. Also, well educated societies can also see the world heading in a bad direction, economically, environmentally, and/or politically and decide to be responsible and not being a child into such a world. Unfortunately, the latter means we leave the world to an ever increasing population of idiots.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                My only disagreement is where population crises come from. These are cultural and economic issues, generally, not necessary consequences of wealth building.

                Otherwise yeah you’re spot on

      • jackalope@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It literally complains about majority rule and says that society is decaying because more intelligent people are being outbred by their inferiors.

    • Jordan_U@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      One of many things that the right, left, and center can all agree on is (pro) eugenics.

      Idiocracy, and this song, are so explicitly eugenicist and yet people who consider themselves “enlightened liberals”, or even “leftists”, choose not to see them as such.

      They choose not to because to accept that obvious truth would mean that they have some things they need to work out too. That it’s not just MAGA supporters that are upholding white supremacy and ableism.

      In the past 5 years I’ve come to terms with a lot of abhorrent things I used to believe, and a lot of harm that I’ve unknowingly caused in the past.

      Learn better; Do better.

      If you haven’t done hard introspection that has made you uncomfortable, especially if you’re an abled white person, then you’re probably not as enlightened of a person as you see yourself being.