And here we go again, another bOING 737 Max.

  • maynarkh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the result of corporate America not holding its executives personally accountable for gross negligence, and the unregulated monopolistic nature of a bunch of markets. It is well known in the industry that the whole fiasco regarding the 737 Max is caused by the acquisition of McDonnell-Douglas, and its shitty management that integrated with Boeing.

    Who was held responsible for those 300 people dying? Who would have been for these guys? Who will be for the next accident?

    • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Weird that the company used to have a safety culture before the acquisition - I just can’t imagine an aircraft company wanting to throw that away when it’s so valuable to customer trust.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s because the finance chucklefucks ran the numbers, saw data that indicated simply paying out injury and wrongful death settlements and safety penalties appeared to be cheaper than designing a new airframe, and went that route. It’s very literally all a numbers game, and the only numbers that really matter to these idiots are the ones with $ in the front.

        • Untitled4774@sh.itjust.works
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I just watched Fight Club again, and this was literally Ed Norton’s character’s job.

          a x b x c

          If the number for the recall or redesign is higher than the lawsuits, they don’t do it. They let people die.

          The only way to fight it is to have an automatic adjustment to all unit and wrongful death payouts times 10, hell 1000. There should be no cost on a human life.

      • kcuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        6 months ago

        Watch the documentaries, the former MD board basically took over Boeing, moved leadership out of WA to Chicago, set up separate plants (one in Georgia not sure if there are more) to counter union/worker demands in WA, etc. This has been a long process resulting in the rotting of the company from the inside out. The 787 was the first example of their garbage - - even though I like the plane, it had a lot of issues.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 months ago

        Mergers of this type usually have one corporate culture win out over the other. In this case, Boeing’s corporate culture lost out and with it, their safety culture.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is the result of capitalism. That’s all you needed to say.

      • helenslunch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        You can have capitalism and still hold corporations responsible for gross negligence.

          • helenslunch
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            That’s not an inherent problem with capitalism. That’s a problem with corrupt and/or lazy government.