It turns out shoplifting isn’t spiraling out of control, but lawmakers are pushing for tougher penalties for low-level and nonviolent crimes anyway.

Over the last couple of years, it seemed that America was experiencing a shoplifting epidemic. Videos of people brazenly stealing merchandise from retailers often went viral; chains closed some of their stores and cited a rise in theft as the primary reason; and drugstores such as CVS and Walgreens started locking up more of their inventory, including everyday items like toothpaste, soaps, and snacks. Lawmakers from both major parties called for, and in some cases even implemented, more punitive law enforcement policies aimed at bucking the apparent trend.

But evidence of a spike in shoplifting, it turns out, was mostly anecdotal. In fact, there’s little data to suggest that there’s a nationwide problem in need of an immediate response from city councils or state legislatures. Instead, what America seems to be experiencing is less of a shoplifting wave and more of a moral panic.

Now, those more forgiving criminal justice policies are at risk, in part because of a perceived trend that appears to have been overblown.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I worked in the HQ for one of these big American retailers. All in all, the product and customer experience teams know that customers hate this but execs keep siding with the bean counters over the customer.

    If you want to stick it to them, just keep placing online pickup orders. Many places don’t have service fees for pickup, and it forces the retailer to hire employees to run around the store and parking lot.

    Retail stores are not designed like an Amazon warehouse. Fulfilling an online order with your own employees is clunky and inefficient. Also, people who buy online tend to make less impulse purchases than when they’re inside of a Target or Walmart.

    So, all in all, pick up orders cost the company more, make them less money, and force them to hire back the people they replaced with self checkout machines.

    • slurpeesoforion@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Bean counters = investors represented by the board

      Rank and file accountants that often are associated with this term don’t give a shit.

    • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s funny because the grocery I work for is pushing hard on online orders. They love it. The only logic I’ve heard so far is that online orders are a “guaranteed sale”, whatever that’s supposed to mean.

      They literally tell us to set product aside and not put it on the shelf so we can sell it online instead. They are valuing online shoppers way over in store shoppers.

    • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      I work on the customer side at a retailer. The front end always replaced by machines. In fact we’ve never stopped hiring for cashiers.

      I get so sick of the, “I should get a discount since I’m checking myself out.” you are, fool. If we increased the pay so much to actually get people in the store to be cashiers, your prices would skyrocket.

      “I refuse to go to self checkout because I don’t want them to replace the cashiers” fine. Wait in line and stop complaining. It’s easier to station a few people covering 10 registers than 3 people to 3 registers.

      For the record, I don’t make the budget. I’d hire at higher wages anyways. We pay relatively competitively for the area.