• ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    What’s even funnier to me is how people will full on rage when someone brings up female genital mutilation while in the same breath saying circumcision is fine

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      People will defend the most batshit insane things just because they’re used to it.

      But I also think there’s an element of (understandable) insecurity to it.

      If they concluded that mutilating the penises of babies is wrong, then that makes their penis “wrong”, and society is really weird and judgemental about penises. There’s a huge amount of pressure applied to men about their genitals.

      We constantly talk about big dicks and “big dick” energy. Casually saying someone has a small, soft, or ugly dick is seen as a scathing insult, we constantly mock people for it, both in life and in media. Comments about their penises is something used to build up or knock down men. It’s used to make them feel powerful and manly, or weak and emasculated.

      It’s no wonder people rally so hard against those who want to see an end to male genital mutilation. The very victims of it typically don’t want to feel like their dick is “wrong”, because society at large has told them that if their dick is bad, they aren’t real men.

      • Emerald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think it’s important that circumcised people realize that their body isn’t wrong, but rather the procedure is wrong (without a medically necessary reason).

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        People will defend the most batshit insane things just because they’re used to it.

        ITT…

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Dude, yeah. It’s so weird.

      I refused circumcision for my son (25 years ago, US hospital), and had to remind the staff several times because it was just assumed it would be done. I stopped them 3 times during different shifts when they were about to take him from our room for the procedure.

      Then when it came up in conversation when he was an infant, people would say to me ‘you should have done it’, because he would get infections (he never did), or he’d be bullied in gym showers (he never did to my knowledge), or whatever. My take was it should be his decision, not mine.

      The pressure was really intense, though. It’s weird how interested people can be in someone else’s infant’s penis. We’ve never talked about it, but reading stories from other men, I assume he’s happy being uncut, and I’m glad I didn’t do it.

      e: for anyone reading this days later, I did ask my son for his opinion prompted by this conversation, mostly because of responses I got elsewhere in this thread that made me question my decision:

      Me: Hey man, so feel free not to answer this if it’s too personal, but I was having a debate about circumcision and another parent challenged me saying I’d made the wrong decision. So yes/no/I don’t want to talk about it cuz that’s weird, do you regret my decision?

      Son: I don’t, and none of my partners have, either. I only get thumbs up and compliments. I hope that wasn’t too personal.

      Me: Not at all. Thank you for giving me your and your partners’ review!

      So yeah, it’s not just my assumptions. And no regrets.

      • Emerald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        he’d be bullied in gym showers

        what? why would people be seeing your kids genitals in a gym shower? That makes no sense

        • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Have you never been in a highschool where using the gym showers was normal?

          Edit: shorts to showers because autocorrect has become dogshit

          • Emerald@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’m assuming you mean gym showers and not gym shorts. I still don’t get why someone would see someone elses penis in a gym shower. Unless they peeked into the stall or somathing, but that would be sexual harrassment.

                • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  My middle school gym locker room had completely open showers. Like the kind you see in prison scenes on TV. No dividers. No curtains. Just an open room with a bunch of shower heads

                • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Depends I guess. They’re cheaper to do the open style so in poor schools and sports facilities you tend to get them.

                  If you’ve been fortunate enough to go to decent schools and not played sports outside of well funded institutions then you probably wouldn’t have come across them.

                  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Not just in poor schools. My area is pretty affluent, but the school was built in the 1940s, and that’s just how it was back then. I went to that high school for a year (I’m 54) and never saw the boys’, but the girls’ was wide open. I assume the boys’ was too.

      • Boldizzle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        Where the hell did this infections BS come from? I’ve got mine and have never had any infections or am I just really lucky?

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        My take was it should be his decision, not mine.

        It’s not though. They’ll never be able to go back and have it done as an infant. Time machines don’t exist.

        The procedure is much, much easier as an infant than it is as a boy or teenager or adult.

        I respect whatever decision you made. There are reasons for both. But no, he didn’t have the option to go back and have it done easily.

        And sorry about the pressure. You shouldn’t have to go through that, and I hope/expect that aspect is better after 25 years.

        • Darth_Mew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          every slice and dice would be easier as an infant as you wouldn’t remember it anyway. you’re an idiot

          • nomous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            Might as well just go ahead and remove their appendix and tonsils too right? They’ll heal right up and won’t remember a thing right?

          • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            I actually think about the ignored psychological effects of dealing with that level of physical pain so soon after being born a lot.

            Birth is already a traumatic experience for both mother and infant. But to then immediately, with no anesthesia, cut an extremely sensitive part of the infants body off? That has to leave some kind of mental scarring.

            • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I can actually speak to this.

              I was born with a genetic condition affecting my collagen (Ehlers Danlos), which meant my bones were overly soft and, since I was breach til moments before birth, my legs were bowed pretty severely. This was in 1971, and the treatment at that time was the doctors literally bent my legs into position manually and then braced them for my first few years. That’s not how they deal with it nowadays, because they learnt it was horribly painful.

              I don’t remember that initial experience, obviously, but my mother tells me several years later when I was a young child and having problems walking, she took me to the doctor and they finally worked out that I was in excruciating pain all the time. They asked why I hadn’t said anything and I told them it was because everyone was always in excruciating pain, but nobody else was complaining about it, so I shouldn’t either. I’d been in pain since birth, and just figured it was normal.

              That experience prevented me from getting proper care and made my early childhood hell. I still have emotional trauma from it. So yeah, early pain is not benign.

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It is. You can always cut something off later, but you can’t just put it back once it’s gone.

          Based on this conversation, I actually asked him:

          Me: Hey man, so feel free not to answer this if it’s too personal, but I was having a debate about circumcision and another parent challenged me saying I’d made the wrong decision. So yes/no/I don’t want to talk about it cuz that’s weird, do you regret my decision?

          Son: I don’t, and none of my partners have, either. I only get thumbs up and compliments. I hope that wasn’t too personal.

          Me: Not at all. Thank you for giving me your and your partners’ review!

          So yeah, no regrets.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The main problem is that people tend to intuitively think of the least invasive form of male circumcision and the most horrific form of female genital mutilation.

      For both genders, all kinds of forms exist

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        the least invasive form of male circumcision

        Is what’s in these discussions.

        the most horrific form of female genital mutilation.

        Is there any other kind in regular discussion? When people refer to FGM, they’re not talking about labiaplasty (which would be a more appropriate comparison).

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          labiaplasty (which would be a more appropriate comparison).

          How are you coming to this conclusion?

          The foreskin has more nerve endings than the glans, and double that of the clitoris. The labia in contrast has much fewer nerve endings, which is why sexual stimulation is not easily accomplished with simply stimulating the labia. Possible? Yes. But not nearly to the same degree as clitoral stimulation.

          Edit: Given the lack of elaboration, I’ll have to assume the conclusions reached by a gut reaction of “skin is skin” which is not at all how this works.

        • Cockmaster6000@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          A labiaplasty is not equivalent to removal of the foreskin. It would be like removing the clitoral hood. Educate yourself before sharing your thoughts please.