• RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    151
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    If I had a dollar for every time ChatGPT gave me code that worked but didn’t do anything I asked it to, I would have $5. Not because its accurate, but because I only had the patience to correct its work 5 times.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      10 months ago

      ChatGPT is really good at telling me I’m a dumbass and to do it some other way when I ask why my code isn’t working. I’ll give it credit for that.

      • sheogorath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        After it gave me to implement X in your app, you need to take into account A, B, and C 5 times in a row when I asked it on what steps needed to be taken, I cancelled my sub immediately.

        ChatGPT is getting fucking lazy.

        • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Much depends on how you prompt. I have definitely encounters this but some basic default instructions around it can tweak it for any usecase.

          When i prep a gpt i give it a list of information and steps it is supposed to follow and the further context about the job and my system. Stuff it can assume and what it should never assume.

          Creating a good gpt and prompt are alot like programming itself, i can definitely see how if you just want to get some work done that having to do that feels like wasting time but you once a gpt is working its ready to be used any time.

        • UnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          every AI is getting bad. I’m using some off-brand (some might say indie) ones, and they’re slower dumber and have more payed options by the day.

          ChatGPT if not for cheating in school I wouldn’t use it at all probly. Phind.com was my go-to favorite, now can’t search the web for shit gpt option is payed and it’s just dumb. You.com my friend used this, straight ignored my request yesterday.

          do other’s have the same experience? If yes, follow-up question are they dumbing down AI, and keeping the power to themselves? 2nd follow-up how can I selfhost a good AI and what do I need for it to work?

            • Miss Brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Mixtral 8x7B seems fairly capable to me so far. It’s just that I need to wait a few minutes for it to reply, given I’m running it on a 1st gen Ryzen…

              Any models you’d reccommend that fit into 4GB of VRAM?

              I’ve tried Deepseek Coder, and it certainly works well for quickly churning out bash scripts for whatever purpose I can possibly think of

              • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Similar story here with an old 10xx GPU. I’ve just started tinkering with dolphin-mixtral-8x7b, but it’s early days.

                • Miss Brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Dolphin is just peak amusement to me. I’ve asked so many weird things of it that it’s basically just cowering in a corner now, afraid of answering any question for fear of getting another kitten killed.

              • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                An nvidia card with as much memory as possible - the newer the better.

                I’m also beginning to look into the dedicated accelerators like the coral, but at first wash, it looks like lack of onboard memory will be a massive bottleneck.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t think I’ve ever had ChatGPT ask a followup question. It just kinda runs with what you gave it. Maybe if you don’t tell it much of anything it will ask, but I usually supply it with everything it could possibly need.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      Boilerplate that I know by heart but can’t be giving bothered to type? Sure.

      Context specific, unique manipulations? Nah, in going in raw

      • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I can’t speak for GPT, but I usually let copilot take a first pass at things, then when I start to tweak them to fix Copilot’s mistakes, the AI peer-codes it out with me pretty quick.

        I’ve actually managed to get copilot to offer a valid solution to a problem that was cleaner than my own (though it took a few tries).

        Dev AI’s work and save time as long as you know what you’re doing and aren’t trying to lean on the AI to do all the coding.

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      I had a similar experience.

      You know what’s nice tho? Vscode copilot.

      It gives auto complete suggestions like many systems already do. But it also learns from your script and suggests code in your style.

      Even ignoring bad suggestions it’s helped me a ton and paid for itself. Worth the $10.

      My coworker asked for a script and I made it in an hour for him. Dude tried to call me out saying I had it already. Looks like at least a days worth of work.

      “Nope. AI baby.”

  • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Most questions on SO these days are very specific so I doubt ChatGPT would be able to come up with good answers for those. All the easy questions have been answered long ago.

    • TheActualDevil@sffa.community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Especially since ChatGPT can’t think of a new answer, right? It’s working off data that’s already somewhere online. It’s just using predictive text based to determine the next word based on what users have typed. So most of these answers people get from “AI” are out there for these people to get from real people.

      • Japan_50@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t know why you’re getting down voted. That is how it works to my understanding (as a layperson). It was fed training data and is very good at predictive text. I don’t think it can take concepts it’s learned and apply them in novel ways.

          • jpeps@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            This is hilarious but I don’t think fully answers the question. This is a good example of something novel that GPT can do, ie manipulating language according to new rules to create rhythm and rhymes.

            However, to give a more over the top example: if you removed all mention of planes from its corpus, leaving only information on air resistance and materials science, and then asked it for the best way to cross the Atlantic, it would never invent a plane for you.

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Even if it could, there are a lot of APIs or documentation that it hasn’t been trained on enough or at all to be able to answer. The models can, at least currently, only contain so much information, so the more specific or detailed the response you need, the worse it’ll do.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Deciding what to write next based on what it just wrote is reasoning. So saying “it’s just predicting the next word” is very dismissive if you haven’t used it.

          My personal experience was I spent hours googling a for a script. I gave up and typed my problem into chatgpt. It gave working code in seconds.

          It wasn’t just cutting and pasting what was already on Google.

      • DavidGarcia
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I swear, uninformed people who underestimate AI will be the death of us

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Good thing every single programming line is already documented somewhere.

        It doesn’t need to think of new answers.

    • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I disagree. I use chatgpt all the time where I’ll tell it “here’s my block of code” then “here’s the error message I’m getting, how should I resolve this?” I could easily see it working for stack exchange questions. Chatgpt is useful because it’s able to answer specific questions.

      Of course there is some percentage of the time where it’s completely wrong, but I’d put that under 20% for the questions I ask it. And you can tell it’s wrong because the solution doesn’t work, but if I’m not familiar with the subject matter I could waste a lot of time before I figure out why it’s wrong.

  • spiderman@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    At least anon didn’t downvote an question because he found that question “similar” to another “solved” question in stackoverflow.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 months ago

    Didn’t GPT pull in StackOverflow as a source? Questions are probably repeats of existing or close enough.

  • amio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    As bad an idea as that would be, if real, it’s still hard to underperform relative to SO.