Do you have an old PC lying around gathering dust? How about a small-capacity USB flash drive sitting, unloved in a drawer? You can reuse your old computer and a USB flash drive by installing a tiny Linux distribution.

Mini Linux distros are great as they require fewer system resources than other options yet still deliver a whole operating system experience, and we have nine of the smallest Linux distros for you to choose from.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    5 months ago

    tl;dr:

    ArchBang
    Tiny Core Linux
    Absolute Linux
    Porteus
    Puppy Linux
    SliTaz
    antiX Linux
    Bodhi Linux
    Linux Lite

    • Montagge@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I didn’t care for PuppyLinux as it didn’t run well with even just Firefox open. I also didn’t care for the updating structure that seemed to be the idea that you just don’t update packages between releases. I could be wrong on that, but that was what I got from reading on how to keep things up to date. I did like how small it is and how it loads into memory on boot.

      AntiX wouldn’t let me install any packages or update. It would keep telling me I needed to wait a few hours to access the repos. I did like how you could swap between several desktop environments easily.

      • kanzalibrary@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        AntiX wouldn’t let me install any packages or update. It would keep telling me I needed to wait a few hours to access the repos. I did like how you could swap between several desktop environments easily.

        Just manual change the repo and problem solved…

        And I need to clarify this because AntiX IMO, under category Permacomputing for low power consumption without too much sacrificing the function than others [in my experiment].

      • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        The lack of systemd was something I couldn’t get over. I mean the alternative service managers are good but a few apps I really need have a strong dependency on systemd and the adapter packages just weren’t working. Otherwise I highly recommend AntiX. It made my old netbook feel useful again.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I was impressed with antiX as a light-weight system. If you are ok with a tiling window manager, ArchBang is good too.

      They are essentially stripped-down Debian and Arch respectively.