But there are way more Lego tires than doors

Better stick to space. Much more happening there.

The reason it is deemed a security risk, is because the USA government can demand any data from any American company. Hence the USA would be able to demand some of the most personal data of all Dutch citizens.

I am unaware of the defence contract, but there is a good chance that this same risk is not a factor there. For example: hosting NATO data, or providing software solutions can both be done without this risk being a factor.

I’m not saying that the defence contracts are smart or devoid of corruption. Just that the risk that was introduced here may not be a factor.

The best part is that they no longer used AI in their response. Nowhere does that character sequence appear in their response!

When talking about the alot of accidental poisonings, accidental drops from very high buildings, and suicides by two bullets to the back of the head, I always imagine an alot with the face of Putin.

Reference, with image of standard alot: https://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2010/04/alot-is-better-than-you-at-everything.html?m=1

She is very hatable. Not wanting to kick her into a vulcano means you should get checked into a psych ward.

But.

She is not evil. Power hungry, corruptable, arrogant, and generally a massive cunt: yes. But not inherently evil.

Just be happy we never get to see her feet.

Japan has been succesfully testing railguns for naval use. Not as big or fancy as the projects the US focused on. But limited in scope, and aimed at practical use. They seem to have solved the barrel degrading issues well enough to make the guns viable.

That said. I think it is still too far out to focus on right now.

They outperform in certain cases, but not all.

For example; Modern jets are flying sensor suites, that gives them abilities a drone does not have.

Similarly, tanks have become less important, but not irrelevant.

But people who get kids already receive various financial benefits from the state in many countries. But it is usually framed as giving them money, instead of taking from everyone else. In the Netherlands you literally get money per child.

So if I were to reframe this tax as: “people with children get a tax deduction on their pensions”, nobody would bet an eye, as similar benefits are already in place for them. But where does that money come from? Right; Tax payers. So, to give people with children a tax deduction, everyone else needs to pay more. Financially, you end up in the same situation as what is proposed here.

Wouldn’t it be easier, cheaper, and safer to follow with a drone? Just keep an eye on them till they stop or run out of gas, and then move in for the arrest.

However, there is now an unkillable super hero who has gone through immense pain because of your choice. I hope you can find whomever put him in chains in the first place, before he finds you.

Why give the game a number? Just call it after the new protaganist, while creating another game that lays a lot of groundwork for a whole new generation of gaming. (It’s just VR gaming this time.)

HL Alyx was really groundbreaking for its time in the VR world. Few other games combined the user experience, VR immersion, and grapichs into a good game. Just like how HL2 was groundbreaking in the physics department.

OP literally asks like 10 relevant questions for this place, and names their reasons for not naming specific instances. And all you focus on, is the question: who did it?

To me that is proof that OP did the right thing here.

Lets first figure out how to approach this without knowing the pupotrator.

As the guards around Skyrim will sternly remind you: “No lollygaggin”.

If you are in one of the supported locations, I can recommend Breeze. Via Breeze you can’t chat after matching. Instead you get a date planner in front of you. You pay for actual dates, meaning the app wants you to go on dates, since that is what gives them money. Cancelling dates is penalized via badges on your profile, and less priority in the algorithm. Hence, swiping right is a serious action, even more so than a message on the more serious sites. You also get a limited amount of profiles per day (around 5 to 10 or so), so you don’t get lost in swiping sessions. And yes, you do get dates with people who you really don’t click with. But the hour or two spend having a drink are still less of a waste of energy than chatting for 2 weeks to come to the same conclusion.

*How long ago

To which the answer is: 23 days.

How would untrackable digital currency even work?

Any transaction is a request from one to another entity, with some authority registering the exchange of funds. Even bitcoin works like this, where the authority is the consensus of the network, instead of a bank.

Any system without some central authority seems impossible to keep safe from fraud to me. But while I’m skeptical, I’d love to be proven wrong here.

Het probleem met THC, is dat het heel lang in je bloed blijft. Ook lang nadat het uitgewerkt is. Zware gebruikers zijn niet 10 uur na een jointje nog high, terwijl hun bloed de hele dag THC zal bevatten. Dit betekent dat iemand niet 's avonds een jointje kan roken, en 's ochtends legaal de auto in kan stappen. Geen idee wat we er mee moeten, maar het geeft bij dit soort onderzoeken wel een vertekend beeld, want mensen gaan natuurlijk wel gewoon op pad.

If you literally put a line about dealbreakers in your main profile text, it can be quite offputting for the same reasons that the interview style dates are offputting.

Instead, write around the thing you want to say in a more positive way. For example: “I love to take sponteneous weekend trips. Where have you been last?” It filters out most people with fixed responsibiltites like kids and dogs, while opening up a conversation.

Or: “Unfortunately I meed to carry an epipen for when a cute dog does get to close. Fortunately my cat can snuggle with me all day”. Again, you filter the people with dogs, but provide an opening to people who are still interested.