Diplomats say Putin’s brutalisation of Ukraine has brought back darkest memories of occupation under Stalin

Nato must be ready for Russia launching an “existential” war against the Baltic states “masked by a blizzard of disinformation”, ambassadors from the three countries have warned.

Writing exclusively for The Sunday Telegraph, the top diplomats to the UK from Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania said that Russia could “pivot quickly” from Ukraine to invade the Baltic.

And they said that Vladimir Putin’s brutalisation of Ukraine is evoking the three countries’ “darkest memories” of occupation under Stalin.

The Estonian ambassador Viljar Lubi, the Latvian ambassador Ivita Burmistre, and Lithuania’s charge d’affaire Lina Zigmantaite, wrote the joint article to mark Friday’s 20 year anniversary of their countries acceding to Nato.

  • maynarkh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    The US withdrawing from NATO would make NATO pretty much meaningless, since most other NATO members are part of the EU, which has its own military alliances. Notable exception being the UK.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t know if that is true. For the short term … most definitely. But in the end a lot of countries still benefit from the mutual defense clause. NATO would have to reinvent itself for sure, but it is not an unsurmountable problem. It might cause the UK and Canada to withdraw too meaning it will be the defacto European military.

      In the Long run the US would lose so much in their power position towards China. Because if Beijing can just keep trading with the EU and make money there, the US will have a much harder time doing their powerplay. China will annex Taiwan and noone will be able to prevent it.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        The EU also has a mutual defense clause.

        That and many others in Europe. Unfortunately none that Ukraine was a part of.

        Which is why Ukraine needs quick accession to the EU.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The UK is not going to leave the European security architecture, no chance in hell: It would contradict a good millennium of UK foreign policy, they’d rather leave the Commonwealth than have France and Germany, much less the rest of the mainland, united without them.

        It’s the US which is the odd one out in the Anglosphere.

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think you are probably right. But after the own goal that was brexit… I’m not convinced of anything that has to do with these kind of things.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      No need to withdraw from NATO if NATO can effectively prevented from accomplishing its mission (the current political state).