• yildolw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Does that prevent my managed Mastodon instance host from providing Redis over the network to my Mastodon, or does that count as them providing Redis to themselves and then providing Mastodon to me?

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      The wording says “third-parties as a service”, so as long as Redis isn’t accessible by people outside your organization, it’s fine. But paid Redis hosting wouldn’t be allowed on the new license.

      • rbits@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        But paid Redis hosting wouldn’t be allowed on the new license.

        Where does it say this? I can’t see that in the SSPL

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s in the RSALv2:

          You may not make the functionality of the Software or a Modified version available to third parties as a service

          • rbits@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Ah right. You could do a paid Redis service if you use the SSPL license though, right?

            • xthexder@l.sw0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              That does seem to be the case. As long as any modifications to the source are publicly available. Which is pretty reasonable.