• VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    3 months ago

    What’s that? Restaurant owner wants handouts? Tough luck bud, it’s a free market and if you can’t compete that’s on you!

    You want all the reward of being a capitalist with none of the risk. Come back to me when you’ve gotten over your entitlement!

  • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    “Business owners take risks that’s why they should be paid a lot of money” smuglord

    “Of course minimum wage shouldn’t be higher, then the business owner can’t afford to run their business” smuglord

    “Of course the business owner should be compensated! They couldn’t know the market would crash, it would be unfair to punish them for events of chance!” smuglord

    It’s wild how people think it’s a divine right to own a business where you can underpay workers.

  • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I hate how these fuckers complain while poor people are suffering more than them.

    “Waaaaaa I can’t use near slave labour to get rich off my shitty restaurant, waaaaaa”

    Good. Fuck you.

    • BoxedFenders [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      3 months ago

      Remember how the capitalist class kept blaming inflation on the meager COVID relief checks sent to individuals but conveniently overlooked the much larger amount given to small businesses? And how easy it was for them to fraudulently inflate the losses reported?

  • SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Salute to the glorious socialist state of CCCalifornia for literally executing the petty bourgeoise by creating a minimum wage that is almost enough to scrape by on

  • MF_COOM [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 months ago

    $20 USD/hr is a pretty good wage gd. I’m sure you can’t afford to live in SF for that but I bet you’re probably able to gather some savings at least in a lot of the lesser towns with that.

    • JohnBrownNote [comrade/them, des/pair]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      national minimum wage would be like 25 if it kept pace with productivity since the 1970s inflation pre-covid, no idea what the fuck it should be now. something like twice as much if it was on pace with executive plundering.

      • MF_COOM [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 months ago

        Isn’t national minimum wage in the US $7.25? I don’t live in the US but I know y’all didn’t have 300% inflation in the past 4 years

        • SuperZutsuki [they/them, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          42
          ·
          3 months ago

          They’re talking about the decoupling of productivity and wages in the late 70s. If wages had increased in line with productivity increases minimum wage would be like $28-30/hr. The highest minimum wage (adjusted for inflation) was in 1968 and would be about $15/hr today. The real theft is that we produce so much more surplus value than 40 years ago and receive none of it in compensation.

        • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s been 7.25 since 2009. From a quick google it says rent increases (what actually matters to minimum wage employees, not CPI) have outpaced inflation at about 9% increase per year. So, going with that, 7.25(1.09)^15 is about $26.41.

        • Greenleaf [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes but practically speaking for most wage work in CA workers have made a lot more than that (but not $20/hr) for many years. CA has a state minimum wage that is usually much higher than the federal.

          The federal minimum wage represents a legal floor but it’s so low and never changes that it’s functionally meaningless.

      • MF_COOM [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        I didn’t say it was enough, but for a neoliberal hellhole it’s way higher than I would have imagined. A $20 USD/hr wage where I live would be a huge win for the left wing, and our cost of living isn’t appreciably different.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 months ago

      I have a $21/hr guarantee at my job in rural Ohio and it isn’t enough to cover my rent, student loans, car payments, and general living expenses. No idea how anyone is supposed to cut in on $20/hr in California.

    • HexBroke [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      you’re probably able to gather some savings

      With a 40 hour week (rare in the industry) you’re on $40k, or ~$32k after taxes.

      How much are you thinking someone is saving on $600 a week before paying for anything?

  • charly4994 [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    I made 26 an hour my first year working as an RN at a hospital, beyond the fact that I’ve been blacklisted at my local hospitals because the first one was a transphobic piece of shit, I don’t even want to go back anymore, I can work at a nursing home with less interstaff drama, less stress, and less risk to my own health while making more than the hospitals pay even after they had to jump pay up 10+ an hour just to get some nurses back.

    • Greenleaf [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      3 months ago

      I can’t recall the last time I saw more than like 2-3 people working at a fast food restaurant at the same time. A lot of restaurants are getting rid of kids play places since that requires a lot of labor to clean (or just letting them get disgusting). There’s no more labor that can be cut.

    • HAL_9_TRILLION@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Who cares? Franchisees are not restauranteurs. They are businesspeople who want to skim six figures off the top of a restaurant simply because they own it. They do this by exploiting workers and making shittier food at incresasingly smaller portions. They will fire people and shittify their product until they eventually go out of business - and because they are participating in the capitalist ideal, they would do this eventually even without California’s help - or hasn’t anyone noticed that fast food does nothing but get more and more shit.

      This will ultimately drive the market back to owners who are restauranteurs - who care about their place of business, their product and their workers. These people too may make six figures in the running of the restaurant, but they are actively involved in running it and they add enough value to it to justify taking that money from it. The franchise model of American food service has been nothing but a disaster for this country - for workers and for the health of the general public - and I for one am glad to see it crippled in any capacity.

      Edit: to say nothing of the CEOs of these companies and their obscene pay that the franchisees empower.

    • ryepunk [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 months ago

      At this point if you find a place in retail or food that isn’t running on a skeleton crew to barely run the place then it’s probably an accident of scheduling. Because about 15 years ago all the business managers decided that quality experiences in stores is expensive and what are customers gonna do? Shop elsewhere? No, you do the bare minimum, keep the employees miserable and try to force them to quit with terrible work environments so you never need to give them a raise because they all quit within a year. The suckers who stick around get promoted to supervisor and given a pittance of like 40k a year to abuse the shit out others so they will continue to quit within the first year. It’s the cycle of retail hell.

  • Bloobish [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Too fucking bad, you don’t get to have people support your “dreams” of owning a restaurant by working for you on poverty wages you greedy fuck