An image of a Central Committee meeting in Hanoi. Image taken from this article.
General Secretary Nguyễn Phú Trọng implemented an anti-corruption campaign in 2016 called “blazing furnace” in shorthand. Since then, the fire has ripped through both politicians and businesses, up to even the Presidency. Nearly 200,000 party members, 36 Central Committee members, and 50 police/military generals have been disciplined since the initiative began. In 2018, Dinh La Thang, the former party chief of Ho Chi Minh City, became the first sitting Politburo member to be criminally charged, and was sentenced to 30 years in prison. In 2023, President Nguyễn Xuân Phúc was implicated in a corruption scandal and resigned. He was replaced by Võ Văn Thưởng, who was then also caught in a corruption scandal a year later in March 2024, making him the shortest serving President in Vietnamese history. The Presidency is current headed by Võ Thị Ánh Xuân while they find a new President; she also took that role in 2023.
The ousted leaders tend to also be part of the more West-friendly, technocratic faction inside Vietnam, either reflecting how these people also tend to be more easily corrupted, or how the Communist Party is slowly moving away from a foreign policy which allies itself with the West (as Vietnam has comprehensive strategic partnerships with several Western countries), or some combination. Of course, this shouldn’t be overstated - Vietnam has maintained a close friendship with China for years, and both incumbent leaders are intimately familiar with anti-corruption campaigns and how and why they must be conducted in order to deliver maximum public benefit.
America clearly desires Vietnam to pick their side, because America strongly desires another vassal state in East Asia like the Philippines, South Korea, and Japan to further encircle and isolate China. And so the headlines and commentary of Western state propaganda like Radio Free Asia, the BBC, WaPo, Business Insider, etc reveal their increasing annoyance with Vietnam’s government. They often couch this in the standard “objective” economics language); about how removing leaders who foreign investors were reassured by might mean economic pain for Vietnam ahead. As Bhadrakumar noted in 2023, perhaps the BBC revealed their intentions the best:
Reading Vietnamese politics is always difficult — the Communist Party makes its decisions behind closed doors. But hard-line General Secretary Nguyen Phu Trong, who was given an unprecedented third term at last year’s party congress, appears to be consolidating his authority by ousting senior officials seen as more pro-Western and pro-business. Officially this is all happening in the name of fighting corruption,… but it’s indicative of a power struggle at the top of the party… the likely rise now of more security-focused officials to the top of the party will be bad news.
Even a quick google search right now will show a bunch of articles by clearly nervous Westerners: Why Vietnam’s Escalating Anti-Corruption Campaign Might Backfire because, as we all know, only authoritarian regimes are vulnerable to things like public opinion and discontent, while Western “democracies” are insulated from such petty phenomena. Leaders here can have disapproval ratings of 60-70% and not even the slightest consequence will happen to them - a real sign of democratic freedom and justice over those primitive regimes in the East! Or, take: ‘Blazing Furnace’ Turns Vietnam Into Another Chinese Province; China turning both Russia and Vietnam into their provinces in just two years was a real diplomatic masterclass. Or, back in 2022: Vietnam’s ‘blazing furnace’ crackdown burns $40 bln off stocks. Not the stocks! Anything but the stocks!
If your actions as a leader are pissing off Bloomberg, you are going in the right direction.
The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you’ve wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don’t worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.
The Country of the Week is Vietnam! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Please check out the HexAtlas!
The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week’s thread is here.
Israel-Palestine Conflict
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.
Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
Harvard’s Gaza encampment ends after administration agrees to meet
This is the Brown thing all over again isn’t it? Disbanding an encampment over a vague promise to discuss the demands instead of actually fulfilling them? The organizers say that they are aware that this isn’t a win for divestment but that it is a win for organizing and that they’re going to continue the struggle “through other means”? I’m sure they mean what they say but this is just proving to colleges that vaguely promising “discussions” of divestment works to shut down encampments and I feel like other schools are going to start employing this tactic too now that Brown and Harvard have set an example.
The last few weeks have just shown how unprepared the left in the West is for when stuff starts going down. It’s like going to war with centuries old muskets, while your opponents have tanks and airplanes. Which is quite a fitting analogy, since quite a few of the most popular ideologies among the western left have not been relevant globally for nearly a century.
Tbh it’s students, with very limited outside agitators influence. I doubt they even learnt history of vietnam war protests.
(Not that allowing full spectrum of anarchists and commies on them would make them any more coherent)
Yeah, kids don’t know stuff yet. They didn’t go through blm as adults, they were kids for occupy, they weren’t born yet for the iraq war protests.
I mean the student protests in South Africa during #feesmustfall got us free education for anyone who comes from a household earning less than R350 000 a year, student protests definitely can achieve big goals. It just seems that a lot of the pro Palestine student protests lack numbers, have made mistakes that have alienated other students (ignoring the fratbros here, they would never be pro Palestine), and fold towards the smallest of concessions. It legitimately seems that they are trying to start a mass movement from first principles or something.
Huh, can you elaborate on what you mean by the mistakes made that alienated other students? I’m curious.
From my perspective, I feel like there’s a lack of militancy (a more focused organizational structure cough vanguard party esque cough would probably help with this) and this tendency to get bogged down with the idea of organizing for organizing’s sake. I’m curious to hear your critiques.
Repeated failures are necessary stepping stones towards (hopefully) eventual success. The somewhat nice thing about this particular protest is that even if they totally fail, the main vector of opposition to Israel is still functioning (that is, of course, direct violence against Israel via Hamas and Hezbollah and Ansarallah etc). It would absolutely be helpful to accelerate BDS in the United States and elsewhere, but the issue of Israel is so important to Western imperial strategy that they cannot be allowed to let little things like mass movements and democracy influence it. I think a solid 75% of Israel’s existing ties will remain intact right to the very end when Netanyahu and the rest of the Knesset are boarding helicopters to escape into Europe as the Resistance dismantles the country in 2024/2025.
If American protests are ever the singular force exerting opposition to an outcome, that outcome has an almost 100% chance of happening, because of the mixture of totalitarian police state, and most protestors being not especially committed nor ideological and certainly rarely strategic. When ML techniques don’t seem to be even considered (and if they are, they don’t seem to be implemented), there’s only so far that a protest can go. It’s not even a numbers problem as BLM demonstrated, just a strategy problem. I believe this problem will eventually be overcome as conditions deteriorate, but it’ll probably take intense and widespread suffering and failures to get to that point.
It’s remarkable how naive even the more disciplined left-leaning people are in these countries.
I mean even the Harvard students acknowledge that this concession is meaningless, but they take it as a win for “organizing”. I just find this whole “organizing for organizing’s sake” idea meaningless. We organize towards specific goals, we don’t organize to prove that organizing works. This valorization of tactics in the abstract is something Western leftists need to pull out of if we ever want any militancy.
:pathetic:
Anyone who thinks universities will divest is a fool. People need to start framing this as a campaign of fear and nuisance for the university or state, or else they will be deeply disillusioned at the end of all this.
Universities are just tax-exempt property empires at this point, often internationally so with links to Israel, and students are fucking up their money.
The protesters are actually more willing to fight cops than they are willing to look “unreasonable” by saying no to these weak proposals aimed at delay.