The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 18 小时前It's a matter of perspectivelemmy.worldimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1494arrow-down118
arrow-up1476arrow-down1imageIt's a matter of perspectivelemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 18 小时前message-square82fedilink
minus-squareTherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up33arrow-down25·13 小时前And liberals (Just trying to be inclusive)
minus-squaretrashgirlfriend@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up28arrow-down4·12 小时前Once again the anarchists are the only correct group it’s like the curse of Nostradamus
minus-squareRestrictedAccount@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down7·edit-212 小时前More like the curse of nostradumbass
minus-squaretrashgirlfriend@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30arrow-down1·12 小时前lemmy user DESTROYS the philosophical tendency of anarchism with FACTS and LOGIC and EXTREMELY mediocre WORDPLAY
minus-squareRestrictedAccount@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 小时前I disagree! That wordplay is nowhere near good enough to be considered mediocre
minus-squaretrashgirlfriend@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·23 分钟前I was considering editing my comment to say subpar but I decided I didn’t care that much
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down4·12 小时前Are anarchists actually practicing anarchism if they form groups?
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·10 小时前Iff they’re not hierarchical
minus-squareimaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 小时前Are “Iffs” a thing? I’ve been missing out.
minus-squareAbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up13·11 小时前Actually yes. As long as the group only acts in a way that all members approve of, and members are free to leave or join.
minus-squaretrashgirlfriend@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·12 小时前“Anarchism is when there’s one guy alone in the forest.” -Mikhail Bakunin
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down6·12 小时前Did Mikhail Bakunin think that women could not be anarchists?
minus-squaretrashgirlfriend@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·12 小时前Of course not, if there were women in the forest they would be clearly accompanied by the Internet Argument Bear and therefore it wouldn’t be anarchism.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·12 小时前I thought the woman might be busy having three kids with one of Bakunin’s disciples while still married to Bakunin. Dude lived an interesting life.
and tankies*
And liberals
(Just trying to be inclusive)
And my axe
Once again the anarchists are the only correct group
it’s like the curse of Nostradamus
More like the curse of nostradumbass
lemmy user DESTROYS the philosophical tendency of anarchism with FACTS and LOGIC and EXTREMELY mediocre WORDPLAY
I disagree!
That wordplay is nowhere near good enough to be considered mediocre
I was considering editing my comment to say subpar but I decided I didn’t care that much
Are anarchists actually practicing anarchism if they form groups?
Iff they’re not hierarchical
Iffs in the wild make me happy.
Are “Iffs” a thing? I’ve been missing out.
Actually yes. As long as the group only acts in a way that all members approve of, and members are free to leave or join.
“Anarchism is when there’s one guy alone in the forest.” -Mikhail Bakunin
Did Mikhail Bakunin think that women could not be anarchists?
Of course not, if there were women in the forest they would be clearly accompanied by the Internet Argument Bear and therefore it wouldn’t be anarchism.
I thought the woman might be busy having three kids with one of Bakunin’s disciples while still married to Bakunin.
Dude lived an interesting life.
People is people