But where does it become obvious and to whom? It should be labeled.
Articles have been coming out with pictures that are more and more random, but there’s an even more recent trend to label them for what they are. We should all push for that
For example: article talking about F-16s for Ukraine with picture labeled “stock photo of B-2 from 2005”. It was obvious to me that it wasn’t an f-16 (and I wonder why it’s even there when it doesn’t add value), but let’s make it clear to anyone - clear that it’s lazy news, not fake news
But where does it become obvious and to whom? It should be labeled.
Dude… Nobody needs help understanding that a photo of Trump kissing Musk is a metaphore. And that’s the whole point: it’s designed to be obviously a metaphore. If you label it, it becomes fucking stupid. And if you need a label, clearly you need to get out of the rock you’ve been living under.
Untie that knot in your pants. Obvious doctored photos and illustrations for satirical purposes have been around forever.
It’s not fake news, it’s satire.
But where does it become obvious and to whom? It should be labeled.
Articles have been coming out with pictures that are more and more random, but there’s an even more recent trend to label them for what they are. We should all push for that
For example: article talking about F-16s for Ukraine with picture labeled “stock photo of B-2 from 2005”. It was obvious to me that it wasn’t an f-16 (and I wonder why it’s even there when it doesn’t add value), but let’s make it clear to anyone - clear that it’s lazy news, not fake news
Dude… Nobody needs help understanding that a photo of Trump kissing Musk is a metaphore. And that’s the whole point: it’s designed to be obviously a metaphore. If you label it, it becomes fucking stupid. And if you need a label, clearly you need to get out of the rock you’ve been living under.