• esadatari@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    jesus fuck i cannot wait for these old bags to fucking croak and take their outdated logic with them.

    • Mister Neon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      131
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hate to break it to you, but the old bags will be replaced by new younger douchebags.

      • MossBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Unless employee owned companies become the norm and CEO driven companies are seen as outdated relic of feudalism.

          • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I still wonder how much is performative, so you can get your next job, and how many have actually drank the Koolaid.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s almost like business school is for those who couldn’t quite cut it as a doctor or lawyer or scientist or engineer…

          As though it predominantly attracts a certain type of person who exhibits psychopathic tendencies in their obsessive pursuit of power.

          • cmbabul@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Also anyone with a random office job that wants an easy raise without really learning anything

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s almost like there’s an entire management philosophy our economy pushes that’s categorically suboptimal for and often at odds with making a solid, sustainable, and engineering-first organization.

          The only thing “classical” business experts are good at is trying to find the quickest route to monetization. This pretty much never yields a product that actual helps people in a meaningful and consistent fashion in the long term.

          Make a thing, and make it well, and it will sell itself. Boeing did this until they acquihired McDonnell Douglass leadership and transitioned their entire business model towards being “investor-first”… and that gave us delights like the 737 MCAS debacle (exacerbated, of course, by deregulation and poor auditing). They used to be one of the true paragons of American engineering. Now they’re just another profit über alles corporation.

          Engineering-centric organizations need to focus a whole hell of a lot more on engineering ethics. These days, it’s mostly an afterthought.

          • JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            That philosophy might hold water if we weren’t living in a world where products have to be designed to a price point for consumers. The highest quality engineered lamp will be outsold by orders of magnitude by the okay lamp that costs less than half as much. Not everyone makes airplanes.

            • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              That’s not what I’m saying. I’m not universally anti-capitalist. Someone who makes a useful thing is absolutely justified in trying to make it efficiently as possible, both in terms of capital as well as environmental considerations (edit: addendum here), as well as some compensation for their expertise, time, and effort, according to which and/or how many customers use it.

              What I object to is the constant drive towards short-term benefit over long-term investment, almost always at the cost of user experience - or these days, more broadly the constant march towards enshitification.

              Our current system of unbounded amoral, and largely unregulated capitalism is very obviously harmful and parasitic to our society in a holistic sense. Milton Friedman’s “shareholder value first” philosophy (which has become standard practice for most of the western world’s corporate governance) has been a cancer on our societies since the moment those words left his mouth.

              Also, fuck the entire concept of omnipresent advertisements with a rusty pipe.

        • jcit878@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          being a cunt 101 sounds like it would be a useful class, but its just reaffirmation for existing cunts

  • athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    The pandemic made it clear to us that our literal lives don’t matter. Record profits have pretty much never made their way into worker’s pockets. Wages have been stagnant against forty years of inflation and record housing costs, while shareholders and C-suites struggle to decide between a private jet or a second yacht. And climate change is coming for all of us. Given all that, why the fuck should we care about some job that has literally never cared about us? Why wouldn’t we get to pursue some work-life balance, and spend what little time and money that are being left to us on something that makes us happy?

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Plus the increased work life balance has been proven by studies to be more productive because people working shorter hours and/or from home are more productive then the regular 40 in the office.

      “But I can’t recognize it by looking at it so everyone must be lazy” some rich jackass.

      • penguin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        10 months ago

        Also, a lazy worker at home will be lazy in an office too.

        If someone likes to procrastinate, you can’t really change that via environment alone.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Unfortunately, leadership positions tend to be mostly interactions with others by forming working relationships and establishing trust so they see skilled workers who are avoiding work by chatting about non-work stuff to be productive team building even when done to excess. So they consider that not being lazy even if it is when done to excess for that particular position.

          Can’t talk about sports teams and ‘team build’ in the same way when working at home in their eyes.

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            I think it’s because they can’t pull people into their office and give them illegal or unethical tasks off the record. Slack and email all leave a paper trail.

          • flathead@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ugh. The number of vacuous conversations endured/overheard in offices about sports. And the insufferable adages, analogies and idiotic motivational speeches comparing sports and wage slavery. Where’s my fucking stapler?

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Setting aside how fucking stupid it is to think that way, people can still talk about stuff like that. In fact, they can now do it without even having to leave their PC!

            No logic here beyond a bunch of loser control freaks missing their completely unnecessary micromanaging.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    10 months ago

    “I’m perfectly happy in my large, quiet office, sitting in my $2000 executive chair in front of my mahogany desk and using my private executive bathroom. I don’t know what these people on the fourth floor are complaining about. We give them cubicles and a ping-pong table (do not use during work hours), don’t we?”

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          To maximize efficiency we cannot have the cubicle walls potentially blocking the path of the farts and sneezes they must all breathe in. Every fart and sneeze must be fully breathed in by staff to cut down on cleaning costs!

      • penguin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        10 months ago

        Now they’re all about open floor plans for collaboration (read: for squeezing more people in the same space).

        • TOModera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Worked at 3 of them that did that. Worst working environmentsever. Current one is experimenting with it, but I’m WFH all the time so I just made it known I never want that.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sometimes you have to give them a little extra to make them more productive. It’s okay, we found a loophole in accounting so it’s a write-off.

    • MossBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Having done cleaning in offices such as these for at least one of the top companies in the world, I fail to see why even this sort of office is all that compelling. Look, a miniature golf statue…

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        They’re not compelling to you and I. They’re a way to show fellow executives how powerful you are. A huge office with expensive furniture means you’re important.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Gotta gather in a room to compare business cards like they do in American Psycho or it just isn’t businessing!

  • PlasmaDistortion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    10 months ago

    He just pissed that business travel is still down. Sorry, it’s never going back to the way it was.

    • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      He is mad because the pandemic allowed people to review their priorities and turn towards their personal lives rather than focusing on career lives. People today are less willing to work overtime, less willing to go above and beyond because they don’t care about that. It means less money for the fat cats which is why they are bitching so much.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah promotions don’t exist anymore, raises only come when you threaten to quit, and the only reward for loyalty is vacation time to use on getting sick. I’m not gonna show unrequited loyalty.

        • TheWoozy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m extremely pissed that my company went to “unlimited personal leave” as long as you can get your work done. I’m already salaried, so technically, I could have always done that. Now I’ve lost the 4 weeks of vacation (earned by decades of seniority) that once enjoyed without guilt or worry.

      • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Over the course of the pandemic I lost my dad and had a baby. I also changed jobs and took a promotion. That really gave me quite a bit of perspective and my priorities absolutely shifted.

        I was(am?) a very ambitious, motivated, “go-getter” who has moved up the ranks fairly quickly and am in a very senior leadership position for my age. I genuinely like what I do, so that definitely helps. But I saw an unqualified person take over my old job and is, at best, ‘coasting’ and more realistically slowly killing an amazing platform I had helped develop–and driving away incredibly talented engineers and analysts.

        Leadership changed and just moved on to the next shiny object and seems content to let that platform flounder because…it’s not their baby. Why on earth would you continue to move that invaluable platform forward when you can make a name for yourself on something else?

        I don’t want this to sound like sour grapes, because its not that. It’s more that I realized, why did I kill myself for that job? The bigwigs seem to be totally fine cutting it loose. Why did I stress myself out to drive that platform forward so hard? Why should I kill myself, sacrifice limited time with my family to drive products forward when, as soon as leadership changes or as soon as I move on, it will get scrapped or forgotten about? It obviously wasn’t nearly as important as they claimed it to be.

        So, I am not killing myself for work. I am taking my entire paternity leave and not taking a single call or text from work. I am not going to work overtime. I am not going to work on my day off. I am not going to travel unnecessarily. I am going to prioritize things that benefit me personally. And I am not going back into the office on someone else’s terms. (I honestly dont mind going in once or twice a week. I do less work in the office than I do at home tbh–as far as “work” goes its usually a free day. But I am fully remote officially and I’d probably hop to another company if they started to force me back in ‘officially’ because, like I said, I am prioritizing me and mine and commuting 45-60minutes each way, paying for parking, to sit on the same Zoom calls I can do at home, doesn’t really benefit me in any way.

    • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      He’s also slightly mad because he now has to compete in a labor market where people can choose between:

      A shitty waiting job that has you flying out of town daily, pay is about as much as a gas station clerk, has you dealing with some of the craziest ideologies on the planet because no one respects your authority. High Stress, low reward situation.

      Then you have work from home: Right off the bat, you get 2 extra hours back from your daily commute. If you have kids, you are now saving hundreds of dollars monthly on child care. Car care costs go down. Gas costs go down. Less stressful situation, and more mentally stable.

      The problem isn’t just that he is having to compete with work from home jobs, but he is now having to compete against the benefits of work from home. And there is only one way to do that: $$$.

      • Staple_Diet@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Agree with everything except;

        If you have kids, you are now saving hundreds of dollars monthly on child care.

        Myself and most WFHers know still put our kids in care, you simply can’t work and look after young kids simultaneously unless you only work at night or during naps.

        • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I do apologize, I seemed to have put every parent into the same logical group of thought, and that is wrong on my part.

          Though I will reiterate the argument that once you start piling the cost savings from a work from home job, companies would have to pay more at a minimum to match those cost savings.

    • comedy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t know if “business traveler” is Frontier’s main customer, exactly.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Frontier doesn’t fly business. If Frontier is pissed off, it is because it is causing the legacy carriers to muscle in on the vacation traffic his company flies.

  • alienanimals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    10 months ago

    This CEO should be forced to work a minimum wage job for the airline to show him what life is like when you’re not a spoiled fat fuck.

    • yokonzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      Nah he would still have so many safety Ney’s that he’d never actually feel real fear or hunger

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          As long as there’s no looming threat of homelessness or starvation, it’s just not the same. If you have a shit job but you know in the back of your mind that you could walk out at any moment and still be just fine for the rest of your life… that safety net makes all the difference in the world in that situation.

          • Андрей Быдло@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            On the time of writing it I was thinking like that: they can either be locked in a lowest position their regular employees have and save their wealth OR lose it and start over from a blank page. The conflict is that they won’t have trouble going to the top once again with their connections and stuff, but they’d not be brave enough to lose everything and would hold onto their dragon’s gold nest whatever it takes. Greed holding them back sounds like a fairy-tailish punishment.

            But in a real context you are right.

  • CptOblivius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not biased at all. A transportation CEO wanting people to use transportation to get to work. I can’t smell any bias.

    • lauha@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      Pretty sure his employees didn’t fly to work before the pandemic either.

        • lauha@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Of course, but most of airline office workers don’t commute by plane.

          • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Don’t think the comment was referring to them. And also doubt that most this guy employees never had the possibility to work from home, so the CEO is talking about other people, eg his possible clients

      • AttackPanda@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        With my job I used to have to fly out and meet business teams every few weeks at their office. Now our business partners have staff working remotely so I no longer have to fly out to their offices as their staff aren’t there. That means we do everything via Zoom and meet more often and engage more directly than previously. It also means that I and my team no longer fly on an airline every few weeks. Everyone wins in this new paradigm except those that focus on business air travel.

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      We legit need to encourage more billionaires to take up the call of the submariner, they just have to engineer and pilot it themselves

  • Rawdogg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This dude can’t talk about laziness he’s got more chins than a Chinese phone book.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Can we just fucking eat the rich already? How many useless cocksuckers do they need to stick a microphone in front of to call us lazy before we just fuck them all up?

    It seems like a daily occurrence at this point that some rich cunt who hasn’t actually done any of the work that makes them rich is saying some brain dead shit like this.

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    These lazy fucks who “work” for me got a taste of empowerment, and now they want me to do shit like respect their time.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    10 months ago

    Oh no, a crazy world event made people start caring about themselves rather than being the most efficient resource for you, their benevolent employer. Won’t somebody think of the CEO and shareholders?

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    What has gotten into all these rich pricks recently? I mean are they all of a sudden without PR folks to keep them from saying just absolutely stupid shit.

    Or are they just scared 🤔

    • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      They have poor management skills in the first place and only really luck into where they are, because of this they have zero adaptability and all they see is a bill for unused office space and with all the easy money recently drying up investors are gonna put the squeeze on c-suite pricks who would rather shoot up prices than eat their golden parachute.

      Middle managers are on board because, similarly, they don’t know how to manage remote work and can’t adapt, which should just mean their salary appropriately adjust downward but lol.

    • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Its common knowledge amongst the rich that we are heading towards a collapse, and ‘emergency villas’ have had booming sales across the last 10 years.

      They know what’s coming, and are going to grab as much as they can before they fly off to their safehouses.

      Jokes on them, psychology says their own armed guards will be taking out their bosses and taking the villas over as soon as shit gets bad.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not even just psychology, history says as much do they not know about the Praetorian guard? They killed a lot of emperors because fuck em.

    • vertigo3pc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Economic calamity is currently happening, and the wealthy are about to lose after everyone else has lost for decades. They’re just saying the quiet part out loud, blaming someone else.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 months ago

    THE PEASANTS WILL COMMUTE DAILY TO MY OVERPRICED GLASS DILDO DOWNTOWN WHERE THEY WILL HAVE TO PAY FOR PARKING AND THEY WILL LIKE IT AND THANK ME.

    • American CEOs