DesiDebugger@lemmygrad.ml to GenZedong@lemmygrad.ml · 9 months agoLockheed CEO Pitches Pentagon on Subscription Softwarearchive.phexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up162arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up161arrow-down1external-linkLockheed CEO Pitches Pentagon on Subscription Softwarearchive.phDesiDebugger@lemmygrad.ml to GenZedong@lemmygrad.ml · 9 months agomessage-square14fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSoviet Snake@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up10·9 months agoI don’t understand, what are they exactly trying to sell them? Subscription for what applications?
minus-squareDesiDebugger@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·9 months agoBasically the US military will only have access to it’s military software as long as they pay Lockheed for access.
minus-squareCriticalResist8@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up11·9 months agoPlease say yes Pentagon. This could actually be the nail in the coffin for the empire, I sincerely expect them to forget to renew in a year or two.
minus-squarekeepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·9 months agoFurthermore, private companies can require you contract them for maintenance, as happens with the F35 and F16 currently (albeit on a country level)
I don’t understand, what are they exactly trying to sell them? Subscription for what applications?
Basically the US military will only have access to it’s military software as long as they pay Lockheed for access.
Please say yes Pentagon. This could actually be the nail in the coffin for the empire, I sincerely expect them to forget to renew in a year or two.
Furthermore, private companies can require you contract them for maintenance, as happens with the F35 and F16 currently (albeit on a country level)