• ADHDefy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I get the impression that many Gen Zers like to know where everyone is all the time. It’s totally normal for them to have each other’s GPS locations. Snapchat has a built-in map feature where you can watch your friends move around in real time, and there are other apps that offer this, too. I was blown away when I learned this was so commonly used and people just leave it on, so their social group just knows precisely where they are all the time.

    • skankhunt42@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I never really understood the “I have nothing to hide” mindset. I’ve always been for privacy. I self host everything I use, and when I don’t (e-mail) I PAY someone to do it for me. No Google services in my life, no apple, etc, etc.

      However, more and more I’m wondering if what I’m doing is worth it. Really, the people who “have nothing to hide” seem fine, nothing bad has happened, and it seems far more likely my information was leaked from a hack (credit carma I’m looking at you). Credit cards know where I am, what I buy… Its endless. Plus now I have stress about my self hosted services going down.

      So these guys who share their location and just live in blissful ignorance, are they on to something? I think life would be ‘easier’ for me on their side…

      • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        81
        ·
        1 year ago

        I never really understood the “I have nothing to hide” mindset.

        This subject is best summed up by the Girl in Andrew Niccol’s vastly underrated movie Anon:

        “It’s not that I have something to hide, I have nothing I want you to see”

        This is the most intelligent, best articulated commentary on privacy I’ve ever seen and it fits in 17 words.

        • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          “It’s not that I have something to hide, I have nothing I want you to see”

          This didn’t really resonate with me at all. Can you explain more?

          • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            When you says “resonate”, do you mean you don’t understand the sentence? Or do you mean you don’t see why you should care?

            Re meaning, the sentence seems blindingly obvious to me. But maybe it isn’t… It means you don’t want privacy because you have something illegal to hide in your house, but because you don’t want to invite anybody in. I really don’t know how to explain it anymore clearly without repeating it verbatim.

            If you don’t see why this is important or you think it doesn’t concern you, send me your address and I’ll come around tonite to take pictures of your furniture without your permission.

            • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m a bit off-put by your tone, but no, I was being genuine. Saying it doesn’t resonate means whatever was said doesn’t seem as profound or meaningful as it does to the person who said it. So the phrase really means that you want to shut everyone out? I guess that makes sense, given the hostility in your response.

              • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You read me wrong my friend. It was nothing more than an honest-to-goodness reply to you. No hostility. Be careful with written discussions, because you don’t see the face of whoever is writing and you tend to slap the state of mind you yourself are in when you read it. Imagine I’m writing this with a smile and that’s pretty much how I wrote it.

                You don’t find the quote profound and that’s fair enough. To each his own opinion. Me, I think it’s a perfect description of the core issue of privacy: having the choice not to expose what I don’t want to expose for no other reason that I don’t want to. I don’t want to shut everybody out, I want to freedom to do it if I so choose and not have to justify myself or suffer consequences.

                Maybe I’m easily impressed :)

        • kraftpudding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          The reason I close the toilet door is mainly because I know others don’t want to witness me peeing. If they didn’t care, I wouldn’t care tbh. Everyone’s priorities regarding privacy are different, but I think for every person at least something feels private.

            • kraftpudding@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t know, it’s not like it’s a secret what I’m doing in there. Going to the toilet looks very similar for most people I assume, so it’s not like someone with decent imagination couldn’t know what it looks like anyway. I don’t see the huge difference in whether the door is open or not other than politeness.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          To be fair, arguably that is more of a sanitary issue that you don’t want your poo poo particles spreading all over your house each time you flush.

      • vlad@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you need to find a happy medium. I’ve accepted that I can’t control ALL the data I generate, so I instead aggressively block ads and any other marketing attempts towards me.

        • edric@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, it all boils down to your threat model. Not everyone has the time, resources, or know-how to self-host everything, so it’s about balancing convenience with privacy, which unfortunately is almost one or the other now.

          • skankhunt42@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is kind of my point. I don’t feel there’s a happy middle right now and unless you go tinfoil hat information is going to get out.

            My threat model is basically “do my best to be as private as possible”. But there is limits. I can spend $100 cash on gas or I can spend $100 on my credit card and get 2% back. Obviously I’m going to use my credit card. I still email people who use Gmail, People who have the facebook, instagram, X, etc on their phone has me as a contact, likely with my full name, email address, physical mailing address.

            So why do I bother keeping my contacts in a selfhosted NextCloud? Why do I avoid the Google Maps app, or anything google when the wife uses all this stuff and I’m with her 90% of the time? I’m starting to think they have my information already anyway so why not welcome google into my life? I have to keep talking myself into the fact that self hosting is worth the extra work I’m causing myself.

            • edric@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Unfortunately it depends on the individual, so no one can really answer your question but yourself. For me, I draw the line when it personally becomes burdensome to maintain something. For example, I use Bitwarden to manage all my passwords, but I don’t trust myself enough to host and maintain a server and keep it online/secure, so I use their hosted service. I use google drive to store some miscellaneous stuff because of the free 15GB storage, but I don’t store any private files (personal photos, documents, etc.). I use ProtonDrive for more important stuff, and for very confidential files, I encrypt them first. I use google maps for navigation because of reliability and accuracy, but I use a separate google account for it. I know that doesn’t do much, but it keeps some level of separation for me personally. I still maintain a facebook account (although I barely use it) because of family, but I still use a facebook container on firefox and don’t use the mobile app. That plus all the privacy extensions.

              The main thing is that it doesn’t have to be black or white. You don’t have to go full hermit, and at the same time you don’t need to fully embed yourself into the google ecosystem. Just do what you can and what you are comfortable with. As they say, don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah I think the bigger problem here is that it’s this hard to have reasonable privacy and governments like it that way. They don’t need a warrant to buy info, just to force release. I don’t like google knowing everything about me. I hate the cops being a check away from it.

            • boerbiet
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              For me it boils down to principles. You’re totally right and many companies I hate will have alot of my info due to others, but I’ll be damned if I cooperate with them.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah maybe it’s growing up in the closet, but yeah. My wife knows where I am in general all the time, but only because I give her heads up. Nobody else knows more than they need.

        It’s not even that I have anything to hide. Aside from not letting my in laws know we’re poly or other such things I’m not really hiding anything. I just don’t see why anyone should know. If someone insists on knowing for no reason then that’s weird and not cool.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ll learn the hard way. Hopefully the hard way is something serious to them but ultimately inconsequential like finding out a partner is cheating, and not like… being murdered.

    • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google Latitude was doing this in 2009 and I knew millennials who used it. Much more widespread now, though.

    • Bread@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hey now, don’t assume we all do that. I don’t need the people I talk to knowing that the only places I go are work, my house, and the Chinese food place every other Tuesday. They might think I don’t have anything to do with my life. They would be right, but I don’t want them thinking it!

    • hyper@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gen Z here. I have Apple’s Find My location setup with my closest friends only (and my mom). I don’t have a reason to hide my locations to my friends, it helps with casually meeting up actually. “Oh XY is nearby, let’s meet and hang for a bit” And my mom has my location for emergencies and vice versa.

      I disabled the snap map though as I have people on there that don’t need to know my location.

    • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah. I’m Gen Z. I was really taken aback when my high school friends had apps on their phones that showed their real time locations to each other. I was like “WHY?” and they responded along the lines of “Well why not?”… I have no words…

  • Eevoltic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    1 year ago

    Article reads as propaganda. No way that zoomers are into this. This just sounds like justification for abusive parents to spy on their children. As a GenZ, I don’t recall having a single friend with this kind of arrangement with their parents, but then again I mostly hung around the more questionable crowd where you actually needed privacy. Would really hope we stop bickering among generations and actually fight for privacy together

    • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For real, how are Millennials falling for the same headlines that were used to spread stupid assumptions about their own generation a decade ago, but this time about Gen Z?

      Contrast to you, I hang out with a pretty straight laced crowd, and we also don’t “track each other on Snapchat” like the article or the top comment here is saying because that’s fucking weird.

      What’s gonna be the Gen Z avocado toast headline, I wonder…

      • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Media literacy classes should be compulsory and deal with all this crap. Its pretty irresponsible as a society that we leave so much to people to figure it all out or be so vulnerable to exploitation and scams. So damn preventable and beneficial when people can help self-curate out the bullshit but echo chambers are also always gonna echo chamber, so there’s that too

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just because a headline was published doesn’t mean people agree with it. You can literally publish whatever the fuck you want as long as you don’t cross a threshold that your core reader base stops trusting the publication. Fluff pieces like this are primetime space for just going off on bullshit with minimal repurcussions.

        Beyond that clickbait/ragebait are absolutely a thing, and so is manufactured consent style propaganda.

        Life360 just needs to have this article published in enough places that it seems like a ton of people are saying it. Gets the ball rolling for the appearance of people sharing this opinion when the reality is that they just got a dozen news sites to reword their press packet.

        • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sorry, I should have specified “in this comment section”. You’re absolutely right about everything you said regarding the online news circlejerk when it comes to “perceptions”.

          There’s just a lot of anti-gen Z comments in this thread that make it seem like we don’t care about privacy issues or tech literacy, when a lot of us do, or we’re JUST learning about the importance of this stuff because the first of our generation are finally gaining independence and footing in society.

      • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So I live with a member of Gen Z, and it must vary from group to group, but the kids I come into contact with are always able to see exactly where their friends are, including randoms they briefly interacted with on Snapchat once.

        I agree that It’s fucking weird. Location sharing on an adhoc basis to coordinate meetups makes sense, but they seem to have this open and broadcasting literally all of the time.

        I also get a lot of chuffing and “You’re being ridiculous” when I try to point out how fucking insane, unsafe and dystopian that is.

        • nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I dunno, I still have location sharing on 24/7 with my millennial buddies from 10-15 years ago when we were partying hard and it was annoying to keep texting or calling to find out which bar or club you were at or moved on to. Especially when you black out and stop responding.

    • duncesplayed@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Article reads as propaganda

      More like advertising. I’d put down a pretty big bet that Life360 sponsored this article and probably wrote a fair chunk of the copy, too.

      • SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Advertising is just propaganda where the politick is centered around consumerism.

        However, even if you consider that “not a real politic” this article skips past the consumerism and straight into police state normalization.

    • Umbrias@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      While more on the parent side of the age gap of things now, I know at least five offspring personally who do this willingly. It is a nightmare to me, moreso the fact that it’s basically impossible or was the last time I looked to find ways to do it that are foss.

      But the point is, probably more people do it than you expect. This place is a selection bias, most people genuinely give no rats ass about their privacy, and, to the shock of many, trust their parents and like the safety net.

      There are certainly secure privacy focused approaches they retain the agency of both parties which could exist. It’s a very real niche.

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is arguably the first generation that grew up with zero privacy. Being watched is normal to them - and absolutely horrifying for this Gen-Xer.

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        this gen x’er isn’t keen on the idea, either. before the days of cell phones, the street lights coming on was the cue it was time to go home–and we could go pretty much anywhere in our (small) town. and later as a teen when we lived close to a city, all mom wanted to know was whether i’d be home for supper. there was no worry because every ‘horrible’ thing to happen to a kid wasn’t published or broadcast for the world to see.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Aren’t Gen Z kids being raised by Gen X’ers? So wouldn’t it stand to reason that their parents are enabling and pushing this?

      • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. Strange isn’t it?

        Gen-Xers are also guilty of letting corporate surveillance happen, thereby letting their children grow under the watchful eye of big data.

        I never said my generation was virtuous. In fact, I blame people my age for not affording the next generation what they themselves got to enjoy. Just like we blamed our boomer parents for enjoying the good life after the war and leaving us the crumbs. Little did we know the ones after us would have it even harder.

      • ickplant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mostly, but also younger boomers and older millennials. It’s not as straightforward as it seems when it comes to generations.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, the whole idea is that kids would be raised by the generation immediately previous by definition, but nowadays that seems Boebert-esque.

    • HubertManne@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but if you were a parent or if you are one. Would you do it? I could see doing it and just trying not to use it but man with some of the crazy kidnappings nowadays I would like to be able to find out where they are or at least have a last time and location for the police to work off of.

      • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah but if you were a parent or if you are one. Would you do it?

        I am and I did not. Kids need to grow up without feeling they are being watched all the time. Or rather more accurately: kids need to grow up without being watched so they can sense when they are and take measures. Kids who grow up without any personal space don’t even realize they’re not free, and that’s a perfect recipe to create adults that accept tyrannical governments without question.

        My kids grew up doing stuff they didn’t tell me about, and I didn’t know where they were half of the time. And yes, at times, I worried. But it was important to let them be.

        the crazy kidnappings nowadays

        I’ve heard people of all ages say that all my life. This is a well-know cognitive bias (i.e. “things were better in the past”) and it’s simply not true. I’m fairly certain our society is much safer today than it was in the past.

        • HubertManne@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I should really have not used the term nowadays. Thing is that folks in the past could not do anything like this to mitigate it. They did not have the option. If you where in the position to need it you might find your decision to not utilize it to be endlessly horrible.

          • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you where in the position to need it you might find your decision to not utilize it to be endlessly horrible.

            It was a choice. I chose to let them risk life and limb doing whatever stupid shit kids do behind their parents’ backs, risk being run over by a car or kidnapped as they walked to school. The risk was very small, and the benefits of letting them grow up with a normal, non-Orwellian childhood far outweighed them. Hell, my generation and those before me grew up like that and survived just fine.

            But I agree: if something really bad had happened, I don’t know how I could have lived with myself. And this always weighed heavily on my mind whenever they were late to come home.

            • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re trading your own feelings for your kid’s long-term well-being and learning. Many people would take the easy approach because your way is “scary”. Bravery is doing what needs to be done even if you’re afraid.

              I’d call that right and proper. It’s what we adults are supposed to do. The number of times I’ve carried a crying infant to get them settled down while I could barely walk from excruciating back pain… It’s our job to take that on.

              It’s funny, many of those parents who are tracking their kids would probably say “I sacrifice every day by working long hours so my kids have a warm, safe home” without realizing that giving them a long leash is also a sacrifice of parent’s (willingly take on worry) so kids grow up well.

            • HubertManne@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah. The other thing is though that if you have a cell phone you are allowing all sorts of companies and maybe governments track you all over the place, but there is an issue with family? Sure they don’t really care so maybe thats a thing but they don’t care till they do which is really wierd. It feels sorta adult to recognize the tracking that is happening and not seeing it as a big deal for the right reasons family wise. Take the opposite. Elderly parents being tracked by adult children. It would be interesting if parents started allowing their children to track them at some age.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nowadays the risk really is compounded, though: not by any of the actual dangers being worse, but instead by adding the new risk of busybodies calling CPS to report you for “neglect” for anything short of extreme helicopter-parenting.

      • Duranie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        My 21yo soon wants to build out a van and take a chunk of time (6 months?) in between jobs and drive around the States. We’re talking over a year from now, but as the idea has come up in discussion I told him that I’d like to have some form of tracker set up. He’s good with it.

        • apis@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Garmin sell these beacon devices, which can be used to either check in with relatives, or to summon help to their location.

          They’re expensive, and intended more for people heading into remote areas, but might give you both some peace of mind, without tracking his every move.

      • Mighty Weaksauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        My sister had trackers in the trunk of all of her kids cars. She told them it was there, they never had a problem with it. The clear signal wasn’t mom and dad are watching you… it was “don’t get into mischief in your own car” lol

        Pretty good advice really 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My family tried to make me install the Spy360 crap last year.

      My GPS spoofer made them regret that 🙂. A few check ins all around the world later (and other chaos) and they basically asked me to uninstall it. Lmao.

      It pays to be more tech literate than your parents.

      Back on topic, I don’t know very many people who have this thing who actually like it, so idk where the hell this article gets it’s sources…

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please tell me you’re educating your family in privacy issues. This tracking circumstance is an excellent opportunity to approach it with a education mindset instead of the stereotypical kids/parents conflict.

        Check out www.theprivacydad.com it’s a great starting point for parents who don’t know tech enough to realize what’s going on.

        • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They don’t care. We have ring doorbells and everything, no matter how many times I point to examples of these things being used for evil, they just brush it off.

          They’re the “I have nothing to hide” and “I don’t care” type. And there’s no convincing them.

          I’ll check out this link, though

          EDIT: To clarify, I had resisted it and argued against it for a few months before it was actually installed. Using a Pinephone during that time stopped the stupidly invasive thing from working and I wasn’t using my S10e as my main phone for that reason 🤣

      • vector_zero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Holy based. I always thought it’d be funny to get into a little cyber war with someone, so thanks for the laugh.

  • lol@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m 18 and fine with my parents knowing where I am so we can coordinate mealtimes and stuff. I really don’t care for having a third party spy on me 24/7 though. We just Signal each other “I’m at xyz location, be back soon” and that’s plenty enough.

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That sounds far more (and acceptably so in my view) stochastic tho, like, do they have on-demand “lets see where lol is right now even though I have zero need to know currently” or is it just like u verbally check-in when they Signal u?

      • lol@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        We just verbally check in and I’m totally fine with saying where I am. I believe the important thing here is trust. If, hypothetically, we were able to set up something privacy-respecting that communicated my GPS location to my parents 24/7, I wouldn’t be a fan of it. It’d feel like my parents are monitoring me because they don’t trust me to be truthful about my whereabouts.

        • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you actually need to, u can “share” as like a thing to attach your actual GPS location in Signal, no different from sharing a pic or file or dictation

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am Gen Z and I’m not fine with that. I chose to go to college far from where I grew up so that I would be independent and free and do stuff on my own accord, like buying a motorcycle.

    • hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The plural of anecdotes isn’t data. You not being fine with that doesn’t mean the majority aren’t.

      • SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have an organ donor on my license. But I’m not trying to kill myself, I’m just following my heart.

        It seems like fewer people in my generation have motorcycles because 1) we have less money (although you can save by replacing a car with one) than previous generations, and 2) the older generations constantly push the narrative that having a motorcycle is equivalent to having a death wish, which circles back to the point that they shouldn’t be spying on us all the time.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re taking a line and putting it on the road against planes.

          Follow your heart all you want, my math teacher in high-school had a motorcycle. Broke his collar bone, fractured his skull, broke his leg and had road rash. Much like smoking cigarettes, you’re allowed to take your life into your own hands. Don’t convince yourself that you’re somehow doing otherwise.

          • SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m being as safe as I can. I’m ATGATT and I started on a beginner bike without much power.

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Listen, again, you can do whatever you want.

              Do not pretend it isn’t dangerous. This behavior will be what turns you into someone like my math teacher.

              • GeekyNerdyNerd@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You sound so paranoid about safety I get the feeling you literally live in a suit of bubble-wrap. If they wanted your finger wagging they’d have asked you for it

          • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The plural of anecdote isnt data. I’ve been riding for 45 years and I’m still here.

            Data shows the vast majority of 2 vehicle motorcycle accidents are the fault of the other vehicle

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Jesus christ, I don’t care what you risk your life doing.

              Claiming that, somehow, riding isn’t dangerous or risky when it’s the other drivers on the road that are at fault is fucking brain damaged.

              All it takes is one, and the rest of your life is fucked. I don’t give a shit what you decide is right for you. Genuinely.

              • Resistentialism@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                There’s significantly less chance of getting fucked for life if yiu actually wear proper safety gear. Doesn’t stop the danger of others, though. But it can lower damage.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know it’s just some rag bait nonsense, but I know as a fact most teens would never want their parents to constantly know where they are and monitor them constantly.

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    Used to share my location with my dad until he kept sending me a McDonald’s order everytime I was at McDonald’s. Then turned it off, lol. My mum still has it.

  • super_user_do@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m a gen zer and I would absolutely freak out. I’d rather not going out rather than being spied 24/7 by my parents. Seriously, this is the best way to kill trust between children and their parents. Now even the social relationship between parents and children has to be extremely toxic and anxiogenic as a basic minimum requirement

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That cant be real—holy shit. Thats worse than picking on kids that dont have an iPhone™️ or any phone or don’t have “the blue bubbles” from using iMessage (which nobody should ever use honestly)

      • derpgon@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fight the system, if someone laughs at you for having a green bubble, just counter by saying you are special and they are just normies like everyone else with blue bubble.

        • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I go even further and say “if you want the real and sick blue bubbles, get Signal”.

          Otherwise, enjoy getting spied on and having all your data handed over from Apple and also iMessage is dogshit. Half the time it doesnt even get delivered/received and you have to literally call or message the person through some real stable means of communication to troubleshoot

          Imma not even get started on iMessage --> skeleton key/zero-day purpose (this is conjecture but I vehemently reject any argument to the contrary)

          • derpgon@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, those people are delusional, but that’s what you get when you raise kids in a world where having expensive shit is more important than teaching them frugality, money saving, and being nice to each other.

            Blue bubbles go brrrr, doesn’t matter the kid doesn’t have attention span due to watching TikTok all day, or eating junk food cuz parents order fast food and have frozen pizza every day for dinner.

            • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              …expensive shit…eating junk food…fast food…frozen pizza…

              You’re hitting dangerously close to home here, lol

    • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      See the thing is I’m fine with it because I know my parents wouldn’t have spied on me 24/7. If they were helicopter parents and DID check where I was every hour of the day I wouldn’t be fine with it.

      • super_user_do@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My parents have always been VERY restrictive about anything but computers (just because they don’t understand them). However, I asked them if they would do it and they told me that’s damn outrageous

  • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    In this thread: people not understanding sampling bias. Of course everyone here likes privacy, and had friends who think similarly. It’s a privacy themed community on a niche tech forum.

    • Eevoltic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Conversely, the sampling done in the GenZ survey was by the tracking company (who you can probably wager have a bias towards anti-privacy…)

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    This comes off like those articles about how office workers “actually hate working from home - can’t wait to return to office!”

    Absolute bullshit.

  • sounddrill@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m ok with my parents knowing where I am at all times(frankly, they don’t care much about that which is good)

    I’m not ok with meta knowing about it

  • NightDice@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Speaking as GenZ (or Millennial, depends who you ask for the definition): fuuuuck that.

    Speaking to the article specifically: I don’t trust a surveillance vendor to work honestly when surveying the acceptance of their surveillance tool. The article also fails to mention (if it does, it’s so brief I missed it) that the pressure some parents put on their kids to install and allow these kinds of spyware is immense. The kid having it on does not equate to the kid choosing to have it on.