Given the current state of partisan polarization, it’s unlikely Biden can get majority job approval next year even with the most fortunate set of circumstances. But the good news for him is that he probably doesn’t have to. Job-approval ratings are crucial indicators in a normal presidential reelection cycle that is basically a referendum on the incumbent’s record. Assuming Trump is the Republican nominee, 2024 will not be a normal reelection cycle for three reasons.

  • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    The “but it could be much worse” argument doesn’t carry much weight for many people on this issue.

    • AnonTwo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Has anyone tried explaining that if you allow in the people literally trying to take their rights away, they won’t get another chance to vote in a politician against genocide?

      Like the genocide is awful but it shouldn’t make people forget they have very close to home issues currently happening right now.

      • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I hear that excuse every single election and have always found it lacking.

        If we always have to wait until after the next election to demand better of the Democrats then we’ll never see any change. “Lesser evilism” will only allow the Democrats to continue sliding the overton window to the right.

        Even if you’re already planning to vote a straight Democrat ticket, don’t tell them that. Make them think you’re a swing voter they need to pander to.

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          How are you hearing it every single election? The main issues didn’t start popping up (or at least blatantly enough to change voter turnout) until the 2016 election.

          Like that’s not nearly enough elections in between to hear the excuse every election.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How are you hearing it every single election?

            He’s only seen 2 that he remembers.

            • AnonTwo@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I don’t particularly care about the democratic party threat, I care about the uptick in voting issues, the supreme court, and…you know…that the opposing party is trying to vote in someone who attempted to not give up the office

              So you know, the recent ones that a lot of people started voting in about.

              If you truly believe that’s nothing new, i’ll just consider you to be part of that astroturfing described above and ask you to stop wasting my time. Seriously…

              • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not going to compromise my principles out of fear. I’d rather write in “none of the above” than hitch my wagon to a party that gets campaign donations from corporate bombmakers like Raytheon.

                If the Democrats want my vote, they should start acting like it. They need to stop pretending they can coast to victory on “lesser evilism” before they end up repeating all their mistakes from 2016, and the threat of withholding my vote is the only leverage I have.

                • AnonTwo@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Stop bullshitting. You’ll sit on your morals while a dictator takes over, just being happy you didn’t “compromise your morals.”

                  Which ultimately just means doing nothing while the dictator takes over.

                  • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Am I bullshitting, or am I applying the only leverage I have over the party?

                    We can’t afford politicians, so the threat of withholding our votes is our only tool for influencing the party.

                    I advise you to stop being a “safe” voter that will always and forever vote blue no matter who. Even if you’re going to vote for Dems anyway, make them think that they need to work for it.

    • Decoy321@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which is still an ignorant take, because we’ve only got two realistic options. Bad and worse.

      Any complaints otherwise are ignorant at best, if not maliciously deceptive.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which is still an ignorant take, because we’ve only got two realistic options. Bad and worse.

        The solution isn’t “shut up and be grateful we’re not worse”. It’s actually running someone that’s good.

        We’ve tried the “shut up you don’t have a choice” strategy and that just keeps ending up with republicans in office.

        Why not just run good candidates that want to help America if they get in office?

        • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You push the Democratic Party candidate to the left. Supporting Republicans (which is what you’re doing if you don’t vote for Joe Biden, full stop) isn’t going to help anyone and won’t get you better candidates in the future. It will literally have the opposite effect. There’s a great batch of possible candidates for 2028 (Witmer, Shapiro, Newsome, etc). Sure I’d prefer them over Biden for 2024 but they’re not running.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Supporting Republicans (which is what you’re doing if you don’t vote for Joe Biden, full stop)

            “Vote red no matter who, because Dems are worse” is how trump became the face of the Republican party…

            If the Dem party’s only standard is “there’s a D next to their name” we’ll gonna keep getting shitty candidates that lose half the elections to republicans. And even when they do win, nothing gets fixed.

            Normally I’d push for primary participation and then begrudgingly voting for the winner of the primary.

            But we don’t even get a primary because a private organization controls that, and they decided we don’t get one.

            Will I still vote for Joe?

            Sure, I’ve voted for every single shitty D candidate in the general since I turned 18. But telling people to just shut up and stop complaining about how fucked it is won’t fix anything. Hasn’t for decades.

            And pretending that shitty milk toast candidates don’t depress turnout and give Republicans a chance, is like asking why poor people don’t just make more money. But you’re not going to reach that 1/3 of eligible voters on a political sub on a fringe social media website

            The absolute easiest way to get them to vote, is run a good candidate.

            So how about you spend your effort communicating that to the Democratic party? That might actually accomplish something…

            Although, they’re probably just say “shut up and vote for me, at least I’m not a Republican”.

        • chakan2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why not just run good candidates that want to help America if they get in office?

          Because that doesn’t make nearly as much money donations as “Look at how awful the Republicans are.”

          If the D’s ran a real candidate that actually cared about the country, they’d get blasted in fund raising…People like Booker would go broke overnight if we got universal healthcare. Pelosi would lose her ass if we outlawed congressional trading.

          We’re fucked…irrevocably completely and utterly fucked.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If the D’s ran a real candidate that actually cared about the country, they’d get blasted in fund raising

            Not really, Bernie and even trump made enough off “small” donations to run effective campaigns.

            The difference is small donations from voters don’t come with all the perks and kickbacks as the same amount from a single PAC/billionaire/organization.

            And as long as the bare minimum is having a D next to your name, grifters are going to run with the D, and get those huge donations because the people making them expect a return.

            So yeah…

            People like Booker would go broke overnight if we got universal healthcare. Pelosi would lose her ass if we outlawed congressional trading.

            Those are two great examples of politicians that need to be replaced, and why our standards need to be more than a single letter.