The House voted Thursday to pass a critical defense policy bill known as the National Defense Authorization Act, which sets the policy agenda and authorizes funding for the Department of Defense annually.

The bill will next be sent to President Joe Biden to be signed into law. The Senate passed the bill Wednesday. The House vote was 310 to 118 with 73 Republicans and 45 Democrats opposing the bill.

The final negotiated version of the NDAA for fiscal year 2024 authorizes $886 billion in national defense funding, an increase of $28 billion over last year.

The sweeping legislation authorizes a 5.2% pay raise for members of the military – the largest raise for service members in more than two decades – as part of a wide range of provisions related to service member pay and benefits, housing and childcare.

In a move that sparked anger from some lawmakers, the bill will also include a short-term extension of a controversial law that permits warrantless surveillance of foreign nationals. Supporters argue it is a critical tool for safeguarding national security, but it has come under criticism from some lawmakers over alleged misuse.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 months ago

      Medicare for All is cheaper than our current system so we would actually have more money for university funding.

      • nous@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Cheaper for who? Not the medical insurance companies, private, for profit, hospitals and large pharmaceutical companies. You know those that can afford to lobby the government to keep their profits high by fucking over everyone else…

    • Hyperreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The US could halve medical spending per capita, use all the money saved to increase defense spending, and still have a better healthcare system with better health outcomes.

      It’s a false dichotomy to suggest that the US has to choose between more defense spending or better healthcare/education. Better healthcare costs a lot less in much of the developed world.

      To give you an idea, the US spends THREE times as much on healthcare per capita as South Korea. You vastly outspend Switzerland and Norway, and they’re significantly richer than Americans, with very high wages. Their per capita GDP is up to 25% higher than that of the US.

      I did the maths, and if the US spent the same as South Korea does on healthcare, America would save roughly 2.4 trillion dollars. In other words, the US could double its military spending, and still have more than enough to offer every American better healthcare and better education.

    • Asafum
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sorry no can do, we just increased the military budget so we don’t have money for completely unnecessary and wasteful things like… Education?

      Raytheon isn’t going to make money on its own now is it!? Be a patriot! Bombs for Billionaires! We have to do our part to help them afford another private island!

      • nous@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Education is not just unnecessary and wasteful, it is activity harmful. What you want the masses to understand how fucked they are and be able to build and vote for a better future!?! Crazy! No keep them dumb and easily distracted so the rich and powerful can stay on top.

        /s

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    an increase of $28 billion over last year.

    “How are we gonna pay for that?”

    –exactly zero of the ‘fiscal responsibility’ politicians that consistently get in the way of your tax money being spent on things you need