• Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      From my understanding, there’s more risk involved in site-to-site than actually stepping on the pad.

      Way less if you’re going from pad to pad.

      When my atoms are being scattered across space, you bet I’d rather walk to the transporter room. I’d prefer a shuttle though.

      something something bones

      • Davel23@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        You are correct. By the TNG era site-to-site transport had become reliable enough that it could be used as needed, but having a pad at one end or the other (or both) of a transport was still safer. It was also more energy-efficient, though that’s less of a concern.

        • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Always a good idea to make things efficient, but “the transporters take too much power” is a sentence you will never hear on a galaxy class at least. Those monsters had insane power generation capability.