• Hugin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Unfortunately a lot of them are unusable. There are a lot of federal incentives to install them but none to keep them functional. I can find ev charging stations but they are almost always rusted connectors or simply broken.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Once you open something up to the general public, they are going to ruin it almost instantly. Source: have worked in customer facing positions in the past.

      • Hugin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah people can treat public stuff like crap. However most of what I’m seeing is stuff that was made as low cost as possible and just can last more than 6 months outside without rusting the charge connector.

  • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    That’s more than I would have thought. I wonder how close we are to those lines crossing, as EV chargers proliferate and gas stations dwindle?

    5 years? 10 years? 20 years?

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Well, considering you almost always leave home with a full “tank” (charge), you don’t need as many EV stations.

      • Thatuserguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        But that ignores the significant number of people that live in apartments and have no convenient access to a charger like homeowners do. If EVs are to become dominant, that problem needs to be addressed with a huge increase in EV chargers compared to what is available now

        • thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Alot of cities around the world are making lamposts with outlets you can plug in to. This would essentially mean every parking bay can become a 'charging station ’ and we don’t need to waste as much land on the equivalent of gas stations like we do today.

          It also satisfies the apartment issue.

          • Z3k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            Problem with these chargers is that at least here in the UK it works out more expensive per mile than petrol. This is pretty much the only thing putting me off as I have no ability to use a home charger at my home.

            • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Is it really ? Did you try doing the calculation ?

              I got an electric car and everyone who don’t own an EV is telling me the same thing. But when I do the calculation even in expensive charger it’s still cheaper per km compared to an ICE.

              However public charger will always be more expensive than a charger at home.

              Edit; I’m not in the UK do I don’t know the situation there.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          This needs to be handled with a federal mandate probably. There should be a minimum (which should increase over time) percentage of charging outlets available per apartment available to rent. It is a huge issue apartment dwellers are being ignored here.

          • Thatuserguy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Agreed. I unfortunately don’t trust apartments to bear that burden unless they’re told to. And even then, the “lamppost” answer the other guy gave very much feels like a handwaved, non-answer. It’s a tricky problem to solve outside of just putting charging stations literally everywhere I feel.

          • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            What about apartments where they are in a dense environment? That’d be a complete waste. Should be a locale law at most.

            We should be incentivizing more than just ev cars- like maybe less cars in general.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Sure, I guess ports per parking space would be better. Make sure there’s at least some percentage of parking that’s available to charge EVs. If your complex doesn’t provide parking then it’s not required.

              Making it local only allows for perverse incentives to screw over people in areas where landowners have more control (which is most places).

  • arin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Battery swap stations when? China already has them for fleets of ev taxis.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Tom Scott did a video about Nio’s battery swap stations in a test facility in Europe

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Never. The industry would have to standardize too much. Maybe for niche applications like taxis or long haul trucking, but not general use.

      It took enough fighting to standardize on a plug, and that’s not 100% there yet.

      • arin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        We don’t have standardized batteries for a lot of electronics, different types of lipo, lead acid but they are swappable(not interchangeable) you understand. Doesn’t mean never. But we need to start, innovation should not stagnant because people think it’s never gonna become one single standardized option. Also that sounds like a monopoly

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          We don’t need it. More chargers can solve the problem fine. Swappable batteries change the infrastructure build out from chargers to swap stations. It’s not going to be deployed any faster, but we already have a running start on chargers.

          Also, there’s savings to be had by integrating the battery directly into the frame. You’re not going to swap that.

          Trying to get the industry to standardize is a waste of time.

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      IMO, battery swaps are the wrong priority. To get them reasonably working you need standardized batteries and a way to identify wear on the battery to figure out the discount or extra charge (wouldn’t be fair if I could swap a battery with 30% degradation for one that’s brand new).

      What we really need is more L2 or L1 chargers. They are a lot cheaper to install and for 90% of drivers they can deliver enough juice to get people where they need to be.

      Put them in every office parking lot and grocery store lot and suddenly EVs become a lot more feasible as daily commuter vehicles (particularly for apartment dwellers).

      Fast charging is only needed for long distance traveling.

      • thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        wouldn’t be fair if I could swap a battery with 30% degradation for one that’s brand new

        Would this matter if you never owned a battery to begin with? I assume degradation would affect your range, but in terms of ‘fairness’ I don’t think it matters too much.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Sure, I was thinking that too but how do you do that? You’d either need a repo rule where if you stop paying a subscription or whatever you have to return the battery, or they come take it. That or you need to pay a large fee for the cost of the battery and you get it back upon its return when you stop the service. The latter solution would lose a lot of customers who can’t or don’t want to afford that cast. The former is a huge hassle and I don’t think it’s work at all. Uninstalling a car battery isn’t simple. I guess it could just be handled as general debt?

          Anyway, there’s a lot of issues with battery swapping to solve a problem that doesn’t really exist, for the vast majority at least. Most people will never need a fast charger or battery swap. They’ll charge at home or work and never have to think about running out. It doesn’t need to be complicated.

      • arin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Pretty sure this is not hard to digitally manage and change payment once deployed.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Never. There’s too much efficiency advantage to making the battery pack part of the structure.

      We dont need to save the gas station industry. Let them go the way of haberdasheries.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    There are a lot more households with electricity running to them than gasoline.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s a good point, though in that particular case it’s a matter of bureaucracy. I faced higher vehicle registration fees starting about seven years back when I bought my plug-in hybrid, which left me scratching my head, since if they wanted to encourage adoption, they wouldn’t institute higher fees so early on in the adoption curve. There is clear opposition by vested interests that have nothing to do with the practicality of the technology itself. Still, given the realities, both bureaucratic and practical, I feel like plug-in hybrids are the best solution for now in most cases.

        • AtariDump@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          NJ wants to raise the cost of the vehicle registration; to some extent I understand. I’m not paying the gas tax which goes towards fixing the roadway so they need to make that money somehow. I just wish they didn’t call it a vehicle registration (I just registered my car last year) and instead called it tax, which is what it is.