My dad uses Google Maps, and he mentioned that it seems to be getting worse. Like, giving him directions that are obviously worse than alternatives. Has anyone else here experienced this?

  • criticon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s an option to prefer fuel saving routes, which are worse most of the time. This was a kinda recent chance and it is enabled by default, try to disable it and see if it helps

    • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It does indicate the “fuel efficient” route pretty clearly though, and always gives multiple other options including the quickest one that isn’t as efficient. If this is what’s causing the issue, OP just needs to look closer at what’s on their screen.

      • whatwhatwhatwhat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        2 months ago

        needs to look closer at what’s on their screen

        IT guy here. The number of tickets I could close with this as the root cause.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Honestly I wish you were able to. Some of these people have no excuse to be as ill proficient as they are, and maybe that would change if you could just tell them they ‘read mother fucker’ and let nature take it’s course.

      • Railing5132@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        In my experience, the “quickest” are more fuel efficient than the “fuel efficient” routes, which take me through residential areas (where every intersection is protected, meaning a stop sign in at least 1 direction) or stair-stepping on county roads where the speed-up/slow-down cycle negates the benefit of driving on slower roads.

        • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s fair, although I think that depends a lot on the type of car you drive. There’s an option to tell Maps what type of car you drive (electric, hybrid, or gas), which will change the results, because cars with regenerative breaking often get better “city” milage than “highway” milage.

          It also probably depends on factors like how aerodynamic your vehicle is, because it makes a huge difference above ~50mph (air resistance/drag increases exponentially with speed)

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fun fact, they let you tell them what kind of vehicle you have for the fuel efficient route. So when we told it we have a PHEV, it started recommending more surface streets than highways. Kinda cool.

    • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      On routes with few starts and stops, the route with the lower speed limit is the more fuel efficient one. Higher speed means higher drag (by the square of speed).

      • EddoWagt
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Mostly because that would be a shorter route then, cars have gears and are more efficient under a higher load so a higher speed, usually around 100kph is most efficient

          • EddoWagt
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I know, but a car’s efficiency is dependent on more factors than speed and friction alone