Jack Sweeney, who gained notoriety for his @ElonJet account on X and maintained many of the suspended accounts, said on Threads that the development is “reminiscent of all my accounts getting suspended on Twitter.” The shuttered accounts, which used publicly available data to show the flight paths of private jets, initially displayed a message on Monday that read, “The link you followed may be broken, or the page may have been removed.”

Meta provided no direct warning or explanation for the suspensions, according to Sweeney, who says the accounts appear “blacked out with no options to interact or receive information.” In a statement to TechCrunch, however, an unnamed Meta spokesperson said “Given the risk of physical harm to individuals, and in keeping with the independent Oversight Board’s recommendation, we’ve disabled these accounts for violating our privacy policy.”

  • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    33 minutes ago

    Corporate censorship. These companies are too powerful and tyrannical.

  • cmrn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This all feels very Streisand Effect. I don’t care about these accounts, but the more attempts there are to suppress them… the more they feel important.

  • mbirth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    But when you report obvious fake accounts that merely exist for 5 days, follow 5000 people already and only have 3 followers themselves but a nice spammy link in their profile, they allegedly don’t violate any terms of services…

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 minutes ago

    It blows my mind that people still use Facebook. What more can Zuckerberg do before people decide to ditch his shit?

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    53 minutes ago

    Now I really want to know where all of these people are going that they have to hide it from the rest of the world.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    196
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The irony of Meta/Facebook - infamous for tracking people online - being upset about jet tracking.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Rules and laws are only for the peasantry. Your level of freedom is proportional to your wealth, so Meta has a whole lotta Freedom™️

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      72
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Tracking those jets isn’t the issue. It’s sharing that information publicly. Facebook doesn’t hand out your personal information to others, and if you think they do, then you don’t understand how targeted ads work.

      • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Facebook doesn’t hand out your personal information to others, and if you think they do, then you don’t understand how targeted ads work.

        It is explicitly stated in the TOS that Meta does indeed hand out your personal information to others.

        If you think they don’t, read the TOS.

        • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          46
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          My name, address and phone number are public too but if you were to share it on social media you’d be breaking the law.

          • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 minutes ago

            If you put your name, address and phone number on a public forum and someone shares that do you think that’s breaking the law? Doxxing generally applies to making personal identifiable information public without that persons consent. Those celebrities are making their own data public, or rather their private jets are because they’re required to publicly broadcast their location in real time.

            If those accounts are collecting public information they’re not doing anything illegal. Otherwise we might as well call libraries illegal because they contain a registry of every book author whose book is in the library.

          • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            2 hours ago

            https://flightradar24.com

            All I need is your flight number. You don’t know how any of this works, do you?

            You don’t even need the Internet, just search up ADS-B receivers on Amazon. The plane and the ATC system itself is tattling on you every second, blasting your position out over the air.

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Facebook doesn’t hand out your personal information to others

        Huh? How do you think ad targeting works?

        • ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          4 hours ago

          “Show my ad to hornly lonely 13 y/o that suffer from Tourette”
          vs
          “Here is a list of 13 y/o that suffer from Tourette”

          One of these options is less profitable for an ad network in the long run.

        • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          An advertiser contacts Facebook and says, ‘We’d like to advertise this product to a specific group of people,’ and Facebook says, ‘Sure, hand us your money and the ad you’d like us to display,’ and then targets that ad to the desired audience. At no point does Facebook hand over user data to the advertiser.

          For example, if I want to advertise my home renovation services to all the elderly home owners in my city, then what use would it be for me if they just handed me a list of those people? None. They’re the advertising platform. It’s them who targets those ads.

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Except you can add a tracking pixel to the destination website after people click through on the ad, which correlates to people’s individual profile. To say that isn’t “handing out personal information to others” is sophistry of the highest order.

            • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              3 hours ago

              They’re not handing out personal information. If you hide stuff like that in your ad links then you’re the malicious actor, not facebook.

              • cygnus@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                You may want to familiarize yourself with how their tracking pixel works. In brief, you add a line of code (provided by Facebook) to any given website and on page load that code displays a 1x1px transparent image from Facebook’s servers that allows them to establish a correlation between the loading of that website and the identity of the person logged in to Facebook on that browser. it isn’t “hiding” anything or circumventing Facebook in any way. It’s a core part of their advertising offerings. https://www.facebook.com/business/goals/retargeting

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You are right the stupid peasants just too stupid to understand big brain things like privacy 🤡

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    the accounts should be used to inform where the tracking information is collected to instead of being the sole container for it. Never trust that anything you do is safe on corporate servers

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Seriously threads and bluesky are false promises, the rest of the fediverse might grow and innovate slowly but it is genuine growth on genuinely community owned platforms.

      Bluesky and threads are visions of the past wearing the future’s clothes. They are investor backed and fundamentally and irrevocably for profit ventures.

      Do not be seduced into wasting your time in stuck in the past, this is a perfect reminder we already know where it will end no matter what their precariously employed devs say.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Those rich fuckers can fly commercial like the rest of us. Upgrade to first and business class and suck it up.

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I just took an 80min flight recently. For shits I looked at the first class upgrade option. It cost three times as much as my coach ticket. I hate flying, and I think airplanes are cramped and very uncomfortable, but I can’t imagine choosing to have a tiny bit bigger seat for an 80min flight over buying two other people tickets or supporting a charity or just buying extra drugs that week. The amount of disposable income or pathological obsession with status to flagrantly make the choice to buy a first class ticket astounds me.

        • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I’d have to guess a lot of the time is companies eating the cost for their people to fly first class rather then it being common for a rando looking to take a flight booking first class

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            51 minutes ago

            Yup. Companies have many times the money a single person does, so they’ll shell out for it. Usually it’s managers and execs who get upgrades, and the regular workers who get economy.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I wonder what a flight with Taylor Swift onboard would look like.

        Extra hassle for flight attendants? The taxpayer would probably pay a couple bucks for a cop at departing and arriving terminals.

        Tour buses seem reasonable.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not lemmy (unless it does support it now?). But from a (k/m)bin instance you can access the mastadon account @elonjet which does the same as the original twitter elonjet.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Any client that can interpret Mastodon data can access it. I don’t believe Lemmy yet has the ability to follow individual users in that way.