• ReadFanon [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s one extremely fast moving, low-flying passenger plane to be able to strike a building like that and especially to completely destroy itself without any traces of plane left from the wreckage.

    It must have been one hell of a bullseye.

      • ReadFanon [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, with the landing gear extended and when the plane has slowed, in a shallow descent over a long distance (at least for passenger planes.)

        If this plane was descended too early then it would have run the risk of colliding with objects close to the ground. If the plane was going slowly it would have left a lot more debris and the collision wouldn’t have been nearly as destructive. If the plane hit the ground it may have destroyed the plane before hitting the building.

        There’s a lot of reasons why this manoeuvre isn’t the same thing as just landing a plane on an airstrip.

    • Sephitard9001 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget that the plane crumpled in on itself to form a sphere before touching the Pentagon’s facade. It’s wings folded inward as a defense mechanism to mitigate collateral damage.