Any Accountability At All Commission

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I remember hoping that Obama would prosecute Bush for all of his crimes, in hindsight it was really naive.

    • Asafum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 hours ago

      We JuSt NeEd To MoVe On AnD hEal As A nAtIoN!

      … /Vomit

      • bcgm3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        47 minutes ago

        Right? I hate that phrase as it’s used here. How are we supposed to move on when national traumas are left unresolved?

  • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The third political party in the US should be The Woodchipper. You don’t vote for candidates, just The Woodchipper. If The Woodchipper gets the majority of votes, all the candidates on the ticket get tossed in a fucking woodchipper and we start the election over with new candidates.

    This fixes our problems, in a uniquely American way.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I don’t want Trump to win because he’s more likely to create a “presidential crimes commission” full of political appointees going after the other party.

    We have the legal system, if there are crimes they should be charged. The answer is not some additional political tribunal.

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If we can’t even get Trump to stop running despite being a convicted felon, I don’t even know if we can catch up with the next fucker. Dude could literally shoot someone on 5th Ave and the government would go “Well, they’re the president, what are you going to do about it?”

  • Talisker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Haha yeah the government that’s currently enabling war crimes is gonna totally make a commission to hold presidents liable for crimes.

    This is why nothing changes. If you start looking at one of them you have to look at all of them.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    organize and take to the streets (and their pockets) if you want that to actually happen.

    • pyrflie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I will believe Impeachment means something once someone is removed from power until then it’s a political threat that means nothing.

      At this point it’s an untested power.

      • OpenStars@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Arguably, it has been tested, several times. Each time it failed, after a fashion. We should be concerned what message that sends to the next person who would contemplate engaging in such impeachment-actionable behaviors.

  • The Dark Lord ☑️@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Why stop there? Have every President, Senator, and Member of Congress investigated at all times. Whether we think they’re corrupt or not.

      • pyrflie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        They should, but don’t, and haven’t ever. At this point I don’t really trust them to.

        Especially given their pinkerton start.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The same FBI that was dismissed by Trump when they looked into him, even though he was totally guilty? Or the same FBI that told civil rights protestors to kill themselves?

        The FBI is the Federal police for crimes the common man commits, not the rich.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s innocent until proven guilty, not innocent until investigated.

        But yes, it would be politicized immediately. If only there was a way to have bad faith actors run a government smoothly, then we’d be cooking with gas.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Getting the money out of elections would go a long way. The problem is that more than half the ones who need to choose to get the money out benefit from it.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      let us know when you develop theory of mind. meanwhile as a non-US person, I very much care which war criminal they will pick, because one will be objectively worse for the rest of the world. and I’m pretty sure a lot of other non-US people do, considering this is a country that has a billion bases all around the world and always interferes with other countries when they’re not actively bombing them, so yeah it’s kind of important.

    • frunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      YANKEE HERE! INSTRUCTIONS UNCLEAR JUST REPOSTED SUBMISSION TO 10 MORE SUBS

      THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATRONAGE AND CONSIDERATION